The CRITICAL Records Integrated Standardization Pipeline (CRISP): End-to-End Processing of Large-scale Multi-institutional OMOP CDM Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While existing critical care EHR datasets such as MIMIC and eICU have enabled significant advances in clinical AI research, the CRITICAL dataset opens new frontiers by providing extensive scale and diversity -- containing 1.95 billion records from 371,365 patients across four geographically diverse CTSA institutions. CRITICAL's unique strength lies in capturing full-spectrum patient journeys, including pre-ICU, ICU, and post-ICU encounters across both inpatient and outpatient settings. This multi-institutional, longitudinal perspective creates transformative opportunities for developing generalizable predictive models and advancing health equity research. However, the richness of this multi-site resource introduces substantial complexity in data harmonization, with heterogeneous collection practices and diverse vocabulary usage patterns requiring sophisticated preprocessing approaches. We present CRISP to unlock the full potential of this valuable resource. CRISP systematically transforms raw Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model data into ML-ready datasets through: (1) transparent data quality management with comprehensive audit trails, (2) cross-vocabulary mapping of heterogeneous medical terminologies to unified SNOMED-CT standards, with deduplication and unit standardization, (3) modular architecture with parallel optimization enabling complete dataset processing in <1 day even on standard computing hardware, and (4) comprehensive baseline model benchmarks spanning multiple clinical prediction tasks to establish reproducible performance standards. By providing processing pipeline, baseline implementations, and detailed transformation documentation, CRISP saves researchers months of preprocessing effort and democratizes access to large-scale multi-institutional critical care data, enabling them to focus on advancing clinical AI.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2025.
Builds on
10 of 33 references.
References · 10
- 2016Recurrent Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series with Missing Valuescited by 554
- 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
- 2018Scalable and accurate deep learning for electronic health recordscited by 280
- 2019MIMIC-Extract: A Data Extraction, Preprocessing, and Representation Pipeline for MIMIC-IIIcited by 122
- 2022An Extensive Data Processing Pipeline for MIMIC-IVcited by 40
- 2019Feature Robustness in Non-stationary Health Records: Caveats to Deployable Model Performance in Common Clinical Machine Learning Taskscited by 39
- 2025Large Language Models are Powerful Electronic Health Record Encoderscited by 26
- 2020Temporal Pointwise Convolutional Networks for Length of Stay Prediction in the Intensive Care Unitcited by 13
- 2019Computing Extremely Accurate Quantiles Using t-Digestscited by 10
- 2023A Multidatabase ExTRaction PipEline (METRE) for Facile Cross Validation in Critical Care Researchcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Position: Medical AI Neglects Real Treatment Outcomescited by 0
- 2026Position: Medical AI Neglects Real Treatment Outcomes28 Jun 2026