mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural Proxies for Sound Synthesizers: Learning Perceptually Informed Preset Representations

arXiv 2509.07635 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2025cs.SD cs.LG eess.AScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning appears as an appealing solution for Automatic Synthesizer Programming (ASP), which aims to assist musicians and sound designers in programming sound synthesizers. However, integrating software synthesizers into training pipelines is challenging due to their potential non-differentiability. This work tackles this challenge by introducing a method to approximate arbitrary synthesizers. Specifically, we train a neural network to map synthesizer presets onto an audio embedding space derived from a pretrained model. This facilitates the definition of a neural proxy that produces compact yet effective representations, thereby enabling the integration of audio embedding loss into neural-based ASP systems for black-box synthesizers. We evaluate the representations derived by various pretrained audio models in the context of neural-based nASP and assess the effectiveness of several neural network architectures, including feedforward, recurrent, and transformer-based models, in defining neural proxies. We evaluate the proposed method using both synthetic and hand-crafted presets from three popular software synthesizers and assess its performance in a synthesizer sound matching downstream task. While the benefits of the learned representation are nuanced by resource requirements, encouraging results were obtained for all synthesizers, paving the way for future research into the application of synthesizer proxies for neural-based ASP systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2025.

Builds on

24 of 47 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  2. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  3. 2022Large-scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentationcited by 719
  4. 2023High-Fidelity Audio Compression with Improved RVQGANcited by 431
  5. 2022Masked Autoencoders that Listencited by 273
  6. 2021Efficient Training of Audio Transformers with Patchoutcited by 226
  7. 2017Neural Audio Synthesis of Musical Notes with WaveNet Autoencoderscited by 225
  8. 2020DDSP: Differentiable Digital Signal Processingcited by 178
  9. 2018DLOW: Domain Flow for Adaptation and Generalizationcited by 177
  10. 2015Training Very Deep Networkscited by 173
  11. 2024Music2Latent: Consistency Autoencoders for Latent Audio Compressioncited by 33
  12. 2022Style Transfer of Audio Effects with Differentiable Signal Processingcited by 18
12 more
  1. 2022DDX7: Differentiable FM Synthesis of Musical Instrument Soundscited by 13
  2. 2021One Billion Audio Sounds from GPU-enabled Modular Synthesiscited by 11
  3. 2021Differentiable Signal Processing With Black-Box Audio Effectscited by 10
  4. 2021DawDreamer: Bridging the Gap Between Digital Audio Workstations and Python Interfacescited by 10
  5. 2022Sound2Synth: Interpreting Sound via FM Synthesizer Parameters Estimationcited by 7
  6. 2024DiffMoog: a Differentiable Modular Synthesizer for Sound Matchingcited by 7
  7. 2019Neural network gradient-based learning of black-box function interfacescited by 5
  8. 2024Creative Text-to-Audio Generation via Synthesizer Programmingcited by 4
  9. 2024Synthesizer Sound Matching Using Audio Spectrogram Transformerscited by 4
  10. 2022Synthesizer Preset Interpolation using Transformer Auto-Encoderscited by 3
  11. 2023SynthScribe: Deep Multimodal Tools for Synthesizer Sound Retrieval and Explorationcited by 3
  12. 2023Low-Complexity Audio Embedding Extractorscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.