mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PaVeRL-SQL: Text-to-SQL via Partial-Match Rewards and Verbal Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2509.07159 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL training of language and agent models

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-SQL models allow users to interact with a database more easily by generating executable SQL statements from natural-language questions. Despite recent successes on simpler databases and questions, current Text-to-SQL methods still suffer from low execution accuracy on industry-scale databases and complex questions involving domain-specific business logic. We present PaVeRL-SQL, a framework that combines Partial-Match Rewards and Verbal Reinforcement Learning to drive self-improvement in reasoning language models (RLMs) for Text-to-SQL. To handle practical use cases, we adopt two pipelines: (1) a newly designed in-context learning framework with group self-evaluation (verbal-RL), using capable open- and closed-source large language models (LLMs) as backbones; and (2) a chain-of-thought (CoT) RL pipeline with a small backbone model (OmniSQL-7B) trained with a specially designed reward function and two-stage RL. These pipelines achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on popular Text-to-SQL benchmarks -- Spider, Spider 2.0, and BIRD. For the industrial-level Spider2.0-SQLite benchmark, the verbal-RL pipeline achieves an execution accuracy 7.4% higher than SOTA, and the CoT pipeline is 1.4% higher. RL training with mixed SQL dialects yields strong, threefold gains, particularly for dialects with limited training data. Overall, PaVeRL-SQL delivers reliable, SOTA Text-to-SQL under realistic industrial constraints. The code is available at https://github.com/PaVeRL-SQL/PaVeRL-SQL.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL training of language and agent models, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 40 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2025.

Builds on

40 of 49 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-training28 Jan

Other references · 39

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  4. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  5. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  6. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
  7. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  8. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
  9. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  10. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 988
  11. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
  12. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
27 more
  1. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  2. 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
  3. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
  4. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 477
  5. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 424
  6. 2024Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agentscited by 421
  7. 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 411
  8. 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 385
  9. 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 238
  10. 2024Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflowscited by 232
  11. 2023RESDSQL: Decoupling Schema Linking and Skeleton Parsing for Text-to-SQLcited by 195
  12. 2024CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQLcited by 187
  13. 2024CHESS: Contextual Harnessing for Efficient SQL Synthesiscited by 169
  14. 2025Phi-4-reasoning Technical Reportcited by 151
  15. 2024CHASE-SQL: Multi-Path Reasoning and Preference Optimized Candidate Selection in Text-to-SQLcited by 138
  16. 2024CodeR: Issue Resolving with Multi-Agent and Task Graphscited by 91
  17. 2025OmniSQL: Synthesizing High-quality Text-to-SQL Data at Scalecited by 91
  18. 2025AceReason-Nemotron: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through Reinforcement Learningcited by 87
  19. 2025SQL-R1: Training Natural Language to SQL Reasoning Model By Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  20. 2023ACT-SQL: In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Automatically-Generated Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 65
  21. 2025Reasoning-SQL: Reinforcement Learning with SQL Tailored Partial Rewards for Reasoning-Enhanced Text-to-SQLcited by 59
  22. 2025Arctic-Text2SQL-R1: Simple Rewards, Strong Reasoning in Text-to-SQLcited by 38
  23. 2023CRUSH4SQL: Collective Retrieval Using Schema Hallucination For Text2SQLcited by 24
  24. 2025STaR-SQL: Self-Taught Reasoner for Text-to-SQLcited by 17
  25. 2024Text-to-SQL Calibration: No Need to Ask -- Just Rescale Model Probabilitiescited by 7
  26. 2025Fundamental Challenges in Evaluating Text2SQL Solutions and Detecting Their Limitationscited by 5
  27. 2025PSM-SQL: Progressive Schema Learning with Multi-granularity Semantics for Text-to-SQLcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CogniSQL-R1-Zero: Lightweight Reinforced Reasoning for Efficient SQL Generation
  2. 2025Sparks of Tabular Reasoning via Text2SQL Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2025GradeSQL: Test-Time Inference with Outcome Reward Models for Text-to-SQL Generation from Large Language Models
  4. 2026FINER-SQL: Boosting Small Language Models for Text-to-SQL
  5. 2025JudgeSQL: Reasoning over SQL Candidates with Weighted Consensus Tournament
  6. 2026Human-Level Text-to-SQL via Reinforcement Learning on Verified Data, Without Pipeline Engineering
  7. 2025Beyond Query-Level Comparison: Fine-Grained Reinforcement Learning for Text-to-SQL with Automated Interpretable Critiques
  8. 2025Think2SQL: Reinforce LLM Reasoning Capabilities for Text2SQL