From Noise to Narrative: Tracing the Origins of Hallucinations in Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As generative AI systems become competent and democratized in science, business, and government, deeper insight into their failure modes now poses an acute need. The occasional volatility in their behavior, such as the propensity of transformer models to hallucinate, impedes trust and adoption of emerging AI solutions in high-stakes areas. In the present work, we establish how and when hallucinations arise in pre-trained transformer models through concept representations captured by sparse autoencoders, under scenarios with experimentally controlled uncertainty in the input space. Our systematic experiments reveal that the number of semantic concepts used by the transformer model grows as the input information becomes increasingly unstructured. In the face of growing uncertainty in the input space, the transformer model becomes prone to activate coherent yet input-insensitive semantic features, leading to hallucinated output. At its extreme, for pure-noise inputs, we identify a wide variety of robustly triggered and meaningful concepts in the intermediate activations of pre-trained transformer models, whose functional integrity we confirm through targeted steering. We also show that hallucinations in the output of a transformer model can be reliably predicted from the concept patterns embedded in transformer layer activations. This collection of insights on transformer internal processing mechanics has immediate consequences for aligning AI models with human values, AI safety, opening the attack surface for potential adversarial attacks, and providing a basis for automatic quantification of a model's hallucination risk.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2025.
Builds on
46 of 64 references.
References · 46
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
34 more
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
- 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 323
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 269
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Modelscited by 197
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 179
- 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
- 2023Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinatecited by 115
- 2025HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmarkcited by 92
- 2024On Large Language Models' Hallucination with Regard to Known Factscited by 43
- 2024Mechanistic Understanding and Mitigation of Language Model Non-Factual Hallucinationscited by 38
- 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoderscited by 38
- 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spacescited by 32
- 2025Prisma: An Open Source Toolkit for Mechanistic Interpretability in Vision and Videocited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Toward Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 7
- 2025Agentic Services Computingcited by 6
- 2026Phantom Paradoxes: Language Models Treat Unresolved Circular Truth Dependence as Contradictioncited by 1
- 2026At the Edge of Understanding: Sparse Autoencoders Trace The Limits of Transformer Generalizationcited by 0
- 2026At the Edge of Understanding: Sparse Autoencoders Trace The Limits of Transformer Generalization24 Jun 2026
- 2026Phantom Paradoxes: Language Models Treat Unresolved Circular Truth Dependence as Contradiction13 Apr 2026
- 2025Toward Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Sparse Autoencoders9 Dec 2025
- 2025Agentic Services Computing29 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Hallucination as Trajectory Commitment: Causal Evidence for Asymmetric Attractor Dynamics in Transformer Generation
- 2025HEAL: An Empirical Study on Hallucinations in Embodied Agents Driven by Large Language Models
- 2023Do Androids Know They're Only Dreaming of Electric Sheep?
- 2026Actionable Hallucination Detection: Translating Latent Uncertainty into Agentic Critique
- 2026Sparse Feature Policy Unlearning Mitigates State Hallucination in Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2025From "Hallucination" to "Suture": Insights from Language Philosophy to Enhance Large Language Models
- 2024Hallucination in Multimodal Foundation Models: A Survey on Causes, Corrections, and Evaluations
- 2026Steering the Verifiability of Multimodal AI Hallucinations