mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Demo: Healthcare Agent Orchestrator (HAO) for Patient Summarization in Molecular Tumor Boards

arXiv 2509.06602 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs) are multidisciplinary forums where oncology specialists collaboratively assess complex patient cases to determine optimal treatment strategies. A central element of this process is the patient summary, typically compiled by a medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, or surgeon, or their trained medical assistant, who distills heterogeneous medical records into a concise narrative to facilitate discussion. This manual approach is often labor-intensive, subjective, and prone to omissions of critical information. To address these limitations, we introduce the Healthcare Agent Orchestrator (HAO), a Large Language Model (LLM)-driven AI agent that coordinates a multi-agent clinical workflow to generate accurate and comprehensive patient summaries for MTBs. Evaluating predicted patient summaries against ground truth presents additional challenges due to stylistic variation, ordering, synonym usage, and phrasing differences, which complicate the measurement of both succinctness and completeness. To overcome these evaluation hurdles, we propose TBFact, a ``model-as-a-judge'' framework designed to assess the comprehensiveness and succinctness of generated summaries. Using a benchmark dataset derived from de-identified tumor board discussions, we applied TBFact to evaluate our Patient History agent. Results show that the agent captured 94% of high-importance information (including partial entailments) and achieved a TBFact recall of 0.84 under strict entailment criteria. We further demonstrate that TBFact enables a data-free evaluation framework that institutions can deploy locally without sharing sensitive clinical data. Together, HAO and TBFact establish a robust foundation for delivering reliable and scalable support to MTBs.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 4 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2025.

Builds on

4 of 8 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023Dense X Retrieval: What Retrieval Granularity Should We Use?cited by 88
  2. 2024AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotatorscited by 28
  3. 2025Towards Effective Extraction and Evaluation of Factual Claimscited by 19
  4. 2025Universal Abstraction: Harnessing Frontier Models to Structure Real-World Data at Scalecited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Development, Evaluation, and Deployment of a Multi-Agent System for Thoracic Tumor Board
  2. 2025HARMON-E: Hierarchical Agentic Reasoning for Multimodal Oncology Notes to Extract Structured Data
  3. 2026Agentic systems for breast cancer treatment recommendations
  4. 2026Evaluating AI Generated Summaries for Cancer Patients
  5. 2024Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Agents for Clinical Decision Making in Oncology
  6. 2025MTBBench: A Multimodal Sequential Clinical Decision-Making Benchmark in Oncology
  7. 2026Configurable Clinical Information Extraction with Agentic RAG: What Works, What Breaks, and Why
  8. 2025MedAgentBoard: Benchmarking Multi-Agent Collaboration with Conventional Methods for Diverse Medical Tasks