Simple Optimizers for Convex Aligned Multi-Objective Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is widely recognized in modern machine learning practice that access to a diverse set of tasks can enhance performance across those tasks. This observation suggests that, unlike in general multi-objective optimization, the objectives in many real-world settings may not be inherently conflicting. To address this, prior work introduced the Aligned Multi-Objective Optimization (AMOO) framework and proposed gradient-based algorithms with provable convergence guarantees. However, existing analysis relies on strong assumptions, particularly strong convexity, which implies the existence of a unique optimal solution. In this work, we relax this assumption and study gradient-descent algorithms for convex AMOO under standard smoothness or Lipschitz continuity conditions-assumptions more consistent with those used in deep learning practice. This generalization requires new analytical tools and metrics to characterize convergence in the convex AMOO setting. We develop such tools, propose scalable algorithms for convex AMOO, and establish their convergence guarantees. Additionally, we prove a novel lower bound that demonstrates the suboptimality of naive equal-weight approaches compared to our methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2025.
Builds on
30 of 42 references.
References · 30
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
- 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,210
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,204
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
- 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
- 2018End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attentioncited by 534
- 2021Conflict-Averse Gradient Descent for Multi-task Learningcited by 459
18 more
- 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 417
- 2016Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Taskscited by 404
- 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 359
- 2017Distral: Robust Multitask Reinforcement Learningcited by 233
- 2022Multi-Task Learning as a Bargaining Gamecited by 215
- 2024The Road Less Scheduledcited by 163
- 2020Relative Flatness and Generalizationcited by 88
- 2019Revisiting the Polyak step sizecited by 55
- 2019Discovery of Useful Questions as Auxiliary Taskscited by 45
- 2024Sharing Knowledge in Multi-Task Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
- 2024MetaAligner: Towards Generalizable Multi-Objective Alignment of Language Modelscited by 44
- 2024Conditional Language Policy: A General Framework for Steerable Multi-Objective Finetuningcited by 43
- 2019DeepOBS: A Deep Learning Optimizer Benchmark Suitecited by 37
- 2017Robust Optimization for Non-Convex Objectivescited by 35
- 2021ProxyBO: Accelerating Neural Architecture Search via Bayesian Optimization with Zero-cost Proxiescited by 22
- 2024Bayesian Uncertainty for Gradient Aggregation in Multi-Task Learningcited by 11
- 2023Two Losses Are Better Than One: Faster Optimization Using a Cheaper Proxycited by 7
- 2025Aligned Multi Objective Optimizationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Imbalanced Gradients in RL Post-Training of Multi-Task LLMscited by 20
- 2025Imbalanced Gradients in RL Post-Training of Multi-Task LLMs22 Oct 2025