Shift Before You Learn: Enabling Low-Rank Representations in Reinforcement Learning
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations
Abstract (arXiv)
Low-rank structure is a common implicit assumption in many modern reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. For instance, reward-free and goal-conditioned RL methods often presume that the successor measure admits a low-rank representation. In this work, we challenge this assumption by first remarking that the successor measure itself is not approximately low-rank. Instead, we demonstrate that a low-rank structure naturally emerges in the shifted successor measure, which captures the system dynamics after bypassing a few initial transitions. We provide finite-sample performance guarantees for the entry-wise estimation of a low-rank approximation of the shifted successor measure from sampled entries. Our analysis reveals that both the approximation and estimation errors are primarily governed by a newly introduced quantitity: the spectral recoverability of the corresponding matrix. To bound this parameter, we derive a new class of functional inequalities for Markov chains that we call Type II Poincar'e inequalities and from which we can quantify the amount of shift needed for effective low-rank approximation and estimation. This analysis shows in particular that the required shift depends on decay of the high-order singular values of the shifted successor measure and is hence typically small in practice. Additionally, we establish a connection between the necessary shift and the local mixing properties of the underlying dynamical system, which provides a natural way of selecting the shift. Finally, we validate our theoretical findings with experiments, and demonstrate that shifting the successor measure indeed leads to improved performance in goal-conditioned RL.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026From Reward-Free Representations to Preferences: Rethinking Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026Spectral Alignment in Forward-Backward Representations via Temporal Abstractioncited by 0
- 2026Switching Successor Measures for Hierarchical Zero-shot Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Factorized Spectral Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Factorized Spectral Representations for Reinforcement Learning15 Jul 2026
- 2026From Reward-Free Representations to Preferences: Rethinking Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning31 May 2026
- 2026Switching Successor Measures for Hierarchical Zero-shot Reinforcement Learning13 May 2026
- 2026Spectral Alignment in Forward-Backward Representations via Temporal Abstraction20 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024The Limits of Transfer Reinforcement Learning with Latent Low-rank Structure
- 2026The Low-Rank Structure of VLA Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Model-free Low-Rank Reinforcement Learning via Leveraged Entry-wise Matrix Estimation
- 2023Matrix Estimation for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Low-Rank Structure
- 2021Representation Learning for Online and Offline RL in Low-rank MDPs
- 2021Provably Efficient Representation Selection in Low-rank Markov Decision Processes: From Online to Offline RL
- 2024Matrix Low-Rank Approximation For Policy Gradient Methods
- 2025Semi-pessimistic Reinforcement Learning