mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

ProToM: Promoting Prosocial Behaviour via Theory of Mind-Informed Feedback

arXiv 2509.05091 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2025cs.AI cs.MAcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While humans are inherently social creatures, the challenge of identifying when and how to assist and collaborate with others - particularly when pursuing independent goals - can hinder cooperation. To address this challenge, we aim to develop an AI system that provides useful feedback to promote prosocial behaviour - actions that benefit others, even when not directly aligned with one's own goals. We introduce ProToM, a Theory of Mind-informed facilitator that promotes prosocial actions in multi-agent systems by providing targeted, context-sensitive feedback to individual agents. ProToM first infers agents' goals using Bayesian inverse planning, then selects feedback to communicate by maximising expected utility, conditioned on the inferred goal distribution. We evaluate our approach against baselines in two multi-agent environments: Doors, Keys, and Gems, as well as Overcooked. Our results suggest that state-of-the-art large language and reasoning models fall short of communicating feedback that is both contextually grounded and well-timed - leading to higher communication overhead and task speedup. In contrast, ProToM provides targeted and helpful feedback, achieving a higher success rate, shorter task completion times, and is consistently preferred by human users.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2025.

Builds on

16 of 39 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023Large Language Modelscited by 776
  2. 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 346
  3. 2023Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 162
  4. 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 148
  5. 2020Watch-And-Help: A Challenge for Social Perception and Human-AI Collaborationcited by 132
  6. 2024MMToM-QA: Multimodal Theory of Mind Question Answeringcited by 85
  7. 2024PARTNR: A Benchmark for Planning and Reasoning in Embodied Multi-agent Taskscited by 79
  8. 2024Hypothetical Minds: Scaffolding Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Tasks with Large Language Modelscited by 47
  9. 2023NOPA: Neurally-guided Online Probabilistic Assistance for Building Socially Intelligent Home Assistantscited by 23
  10. 2024GOMA: Proactive Embodied Cooperative Communication via Goal-Oriented Mental Alignmentcited by 16
  11. 2024Limits of Theory of Mind Modelling in Dialogue-Based Collaborative Plan Acquisitioncited by 10
  12. 2023Towards Collaborative Plan Acquisition through Theory of Mind Modeling in Situated Dialoguecited by 9
4 more
  1. 2023Automated Task-Time Interventions to Improve Teamwork using Imitation Learningcited by 7
  2. 2024Explicit Modelling of Theory of Mind for Belief Prediction in Nonverbal Social Interactionscited by 6
  3. 2024Pragmatic Embodied Spoken Instruction Following in Human-Robot Collaboration with Theory of Mindcited by 6
  4. 2023ToP-ToM: Trust-aware Robot Policy with Theory of Mindcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Simulating Cooperative Prosocial Behavior with Multi-Agent LLMs: Evidence and Mechanisms for AI Agents to Inform Policy Decisions
  2. 2026Belief Without Behavior: Measuring the Translation of Theory of Mind into Coordinated Social Action in Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025MetaMind: Modeling Human Social Thoughts with Metacognitive Multi-Agent Systems
  4. 2024Can Machines Think Like Humans? A Behavioral Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dictator Games
  5. 2026Mechanism Design Is Not Enough: Prosocial Agents for Cooperative AI
  6. 2025Multi-Agent Language Models: Advancing Cooperation, Coordination, and Adaptation
  7. 2023Inferring the Goals of Communicating Agents from Actions and Instructions
  8. 2026AI Should Not Only Be Helpful. It Should Be Contingent. Artificial Intimacy, Sycophancy, and the Future of Social Learning