Unveiling the Role of Data Uncertainty in Tabular Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements in tabular deep learning have demonstrated exceptional practical performance, yet the field often lacks a clear understanding of why these techniques actually succeed. To address this gap, our paper highlights the importance of the concept of data uncertainty for explaining the effectiveness of the recent tabular DL methods. In particular, we reveal that the success of many beneficial design choices in tabular DL, such as numerical feature embeddings, retrieval-augmented models and advanced ensembling strategies, can be largely attributed to their implicit mechanisms for managing high data uncertainty. By dissecting these mechanisms, we provide a unifying understanding of the recent performance improvements. Furthermore, the insights derived from this data-uncertainty perspective directly allowed us to develop more effective numerical feature embeddings as an immediate practical outcome of our analysis. Overall, our work paves the way to foundational understanding of the benefits introduced by modern tabular methods that results in the concrete advancements of existing techniques and outlines future research directions for tabular DL.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2025.
Builds on
20 of 27 references.
References · 20
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
- 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 643
- 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 310
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 218
- 2022On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 185
- 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 151
- 2024TabM: Advancing Tabular Deep Learning with Parameter-Efficient Ensemblingcited by 105
- 2019NGBoost: Natural Gradient Boosting for Probabilistic Predictioncited by 94
- 2024Better by Default: Strong Pre-Tuned MLPs and Boosted Trees on Tabular Datacited by 87
8 more
- 2023TabR: Tabular Deep Learning Meets Nearest Neighbors in 2023cited by 73
- 2020Uncertainty in Gradient Boosting via Ensemblescited by 56
- 2022Revisiting Pretraining Objectives for Tabular Deep Learningcited by 43
- 2023TANGOS: Regularizing Tabular Neural Networks through Gradient Orthogonalization and Specializationcited by 32
- 2024TabReD: Analyzing Pitfalls and Filling the Gaps in Tabular Deep Learning Benchmarkscited by 29
- 2024Why is SAM Robust to Label Noise?cited by 21
- 2024T-JEPA: Augmentation-Free Self-Supervised Learning for Tabular Datacited by 13
- 2025Unreflected Use of Tabular Data Repositories Can Undermine Research Qualitycited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Benchmarking Optimizers for MLPs in Tabular Deep Learning16 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024On the Efficiency of NLP-Inspired Methods for Tabular Deep Learning
- 2025On Finetuning Tabular Foundation Models
- 2024Mambular: A Sequential Model for Tabular Deep Learning
- 2026TabPrep: Closing the Feature Engineering Gap in Tabular Benchmarks
- 2025TabNSA: Native Sparse Attention for Efficient Tabular Data Learning
- 2024A Data-Centric Perspective on Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Tabular Data
- 2020Tabular GANs for uneven distribution
- 2024TabDiff: a Mixed-type Diffusion Model for Tabular Data Generation