mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Primer on Causal and Statistical Dataset Biases for Fair and Robust Image Analysis

arXiv 2509.04295 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.CY stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning methods often fail when deployed in the real world. Worse still, they fail in high-stakes situations and across socially sensitive lines. These issues have a chilling effect on the adoption of machine learning methods in settings such as medical diagnosis, where they are arguably best-placed to provide benefits if safely deployed. In this primer, we introduce the causal and statistical structures which induce failure in machine learning methods for image analysis. We highlight two previously overlooked problems, which we call the textitno fair lunch problem and the textitsubgroup separability problem. We elucidate why today's fair representation learning methods fail to adequately solve them and propose potential paths forward for the field.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2025.

Builds on

15 of 27 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  3. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 503
  4. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  5. 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 156
  6. 2022MEDFAIR: Benchmarking Fairness for Medical Imagingcited by 68
  7. 2013Causal Networks: Semantics and Expressivenesscited by 67
  8. 2023Identifiability of latent-variable and structural-equation models: from linear to nonlinearcited by 58
  9. 2022Leveling Down in Computer Vision: Pareto Inefficiencies in Fair Deep Classifierscited by 53
  10. 2022Improving the Fairness of Chest X-ray Classifierscited by 52
  11. 2020An Empirical Characterization of Fair Machine Learning For Clinical Risk Predictioncited by 45
  12. 2023The Unfairness of Fair Machine Learning: Levelling down and strict egalitarianism by defaultcited by 36
3 more
  1. 2022Potential sources of dataset bias complicate investigation of underdiagnosis by machine learning algorithmscited by 19
  2. 2023The Role of Subgroup Separability in Group-Fair Medical Image Classificationcited by 11
  3. 2024Rethinking Fair Representation Learning for Performance-Sensitive Taskscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.