mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SPECS: Specificity-Enhanced CLIP-Score for Long Image Caption Evaluation

arXiv 2509.03897 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As interest grows in generating long, detailed image captions, standard evaluation metrics become increasingly unreliable. N-gram-based metrics though efficient, fail to capture semantic correctness. Representational Similarity (RS) metrics, designed to address this, initially saw limited use due to high computational costs, while today, despite advances in hardware, they remain unpopular due to low correlation to human judgments. Meanwhile, metrics based on large language models (LLMs) show strong correlation with human judgments, but remain too expensive for iterative use during model development. We introduce SPECS (Specificity-Enhanced CLIPScore), a reference-free RS metric tailored to long image captioning. SPECS modifies CLIP with a new objective that emphasizes specificity: rewarding correct details and penalizing incorrect ones. We show that SPECS matches the performance of open-source LLM-based metrics in correlation to human judgments, while being far more efficient. This makes it a practical alternative for iterative checkpoint evaluation during image captioning model development.Our code can be found at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/SPECS.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2025.

Builds on

27 of 40 references.

References · 27

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  5. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  6. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  7. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
  8. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
  9. 2023ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captionscited by 1,005
  10. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
  11. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 824
  12. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
15 more
  1. 2024Long-CLIP: Unlocking the Long-Text Capability of CLIPcited by 300
  2. 2023Improving CLIP Training with Language Rewritescited by 217
  3. 2024Paying More Attention to Image: A Training-Free Method for Alleviating Hallucination in LVLMscited by 179
  4. 2015DenseCap: Fully Convolutional Localization Networks for Dense Captioningcited by 176
  5. 2024Benchmarking and Improving Detail Image Captioncited by 81
  6. 2025FG-CLIP: Fine-Grained Visual and Textual Alignmentcited by 81
  7. 2023Positive-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Image and Video Captioning Evaluationcited by 78
  8. 2023Dense and Aligned Captions (DAC) Promote Compositional Reasoning in VL Modelscited by 72
  9. 2022Fine-grained Image Captioning with CLIP Rewardcited by 69
  10. 2024TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negativescited by 58
  11. 2024ImageInWords: Unlocking Hyper-Detailed Image Descriptionscited by 57
  12. 2024FLEUR: An Explainable Reference-Free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning Using a Large Multimodal Modelcited by 45
  13. 2024SUGARCREPE++ Dataset: Vision-Language Model Sensitivity to Semantic and Lexical Alterationscited by 42
  14. 2025Painting with Words: Elevating Detailed Image Captioning with Benchmark and Alignment Learningcited by 25
  15. 2023Benchmarking Zero-Shot Recognition with Vision-Language Models: Challenges on Granularity and Specificitycited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.