mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MAUSAM: An Observations-focused assessment of Global AI Weather Prediction Models During the South Asian Monsoon

arXiv 2509.01879 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2025physics.ao-ph cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate weather forecasts are critical for societal planning and disaster preparedness. Yet these forecasts remain challenging to produce and evaluate, especially in regions with sparse observational coverage. Current evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) weather prediction relies primarily on reanalyses, which can obscure important deficiencies. Here we present MAUSAM (Measuring AI Uncertainty during South Asian Monsoon), an evaluation of seven leading AI-based forecasting systems - FourCastNet, FourCastNet-SFNO, Pangu-Weather, GraphCast, Aurora, AIFS, and GenCast - during the South Asian Monsoon, using ground-based weather stations, rain gauge networks, and geostationary satellite imagery. The AI models demonstrate impressive forecast skill during monsoon across a broad range of variables, ranging from large-scale surface temperature and winds to precipitation, cloud cover, and subseasonal to seasonal eddy statistics, highlighting the strength of data-driven weather prediction. However, the models still exhibit systematic errors at finer scales like the underprediction of extreme precipitation, divergent cyclone tracks, and the mesoscale kinetic energy spectra, highlighting avenues for future improvement. A comparison against observations reveals forecast errors up to 15-45% larger than those relative to reanalysis and traditional forecasts, indicating that reanalysis-centric benchmarks can overstate forecast skill. Of the models assessed, AIFS achieves the most consistent representation of atmospheric variables, with GraphCast and GenCast also showing strong skill. The analysis presents a framework for evaluating AI weather models on regional prediction and highlights both the promise and current limitations of AI weather prediction in data-sparse regions, underscoring the importance of observational evaluation for future operational adoption.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2025.

Builds on

10 of 50 references.

References · 10

  1. 2022FourCastNet: A Global Data-driven High-resolution Weather Model using Adaptive Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 776
  2. 2023Neural General Circulation Models for Weather and Climatecited by 239
  3. 2023WeatherBench 2: A benchmark for the next generation of data-driven global weather modelscited by 236
  4. 2023Spherical Fourier Neural Operators: Learning Stable Dynamics on the Spherecited by 233
  5. 2023Residual Corrective Diffusion Modeling for Km-scale Atmospheric Downscalingcited by 110
  6. 2021Sub-seasonal forecasting with a large ensemble of deep-learning weather prediction modelscited by 79
  7. 2024Can AI weather models predict out-of-distribution gray swan tropical cyclones?cited by 26
  8. 2024A Practical Probabilistic Benchmark for AI Weather Modelscited by 25
  9. 2023Dynamical Tests of a Deep-Learning Weather Prediction Modelcited by 24
  10. 2023Do AI models produce better weather forecasts than physics-based models? A quantitative evaluation case study of Storm Ciar'ancited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.