mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SATQuest: A Verifier for Logical Reasoning Evaluation and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of LLMs

arXiv 2509.00930 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2025cs.AI cs.LG cs.LOcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong general reasoning, yet the community lacks controllable, scalable, and verifiable tools to analyze and improve these abilities. We present SATQuest, a verifier that generates diverse SAT-based reasoning tasks directly from Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) instances and checks answers objectively with PySAT. SATQuest factorizes evaluation along three orthogonal dimensions: instance, problem type, and question format, enabling fine-grained, multi-dimensional analysis and reinforcement fine-tuning. Randomized CNF generation mitigates memorization and supports reproducible experiments. Using SATQuest, we benchmark a range of open- and closed-weight LLMs and uncover persistent gaps in logical reasoning, particularly on higher-complexity tasks and in transfer beyond familiar mathematical notation to machine or narrative formats. We further show that reinforcement fine-tuning with SATQuest rewards substantially boosts targeted performance and generalizes to larger instances, while cross-format robustness remains challenging. Collectively, SATQuest provides verifier-backed infrastructure for controlled, scalable, and reproducible empirical research on LLM logical reasoning and its training.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2025.

Builds on

12 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Have Large Language Models Learned to Reason? A Characterization via 3-SAT Phase Transition4 Apr
  2. 2025Benchmarking Reasoning Robustness in Large Language Models6 Mar
  3. 2025BIG-Bench Extra Hard26 Feb
  4. 2025ThinkBench: Dynamic Out-of-Distribution Evaluation for Robust LLM Reasoning22 Feb
  5. 2025ZebraLogic: On the Scaling Limits of LLMs for Logical Reasoning3 Feb

Other references · 7

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2025Logic-RL: Unleashing LLM Reasoning with Rule-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 262
  5. 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 243
  6. 2024Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Followingcited by 102
  7. 2025SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation across 285 Graduate Disciplinescited by 79

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SATBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Logical Reasoning via Automated Puzzle Generation from SAT Formulas
  2. 2025Reasoning on a Budget: A Survey of Adaptive and Controllable Test-Time Compute in LLMs
  3. 2024Leveraging LLMs for Hypothetical Deduction in Logical Inference: A Neuro-Symbolic Approach
  4. 2024Inference Scaling vs Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal LLM Problem-Solving
  5. 2025Prompting Test-Time Scaling Is A Strong LLM Reasoning Data Augmentation
  6. 2025FINEREASON: Evaluating and Improving LLMs' Deliberate Reasoning through Reflective Puzzle Solving
  7. 2024Can Large Language Models Reason? A Characterization via 3-SAT
  8. 2025SATURN: SAT-based Reinforcement Learning to Unleash LLMs Reasoning