mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Negative Matters: Multi-Granularity Hard-Negative Synthesis and Anchor-Token-Aware Pooling for Enhanced Text Embeddings

arXiv 2509.00842 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text embedding models are essential for various natural language processing tasks, enabling the effective encoding of semantic information into dense vector representations. These models are typically optimized using triplets of (query, positive, negative) data pairs for contrastive learning, where the negative samples play a critical role in enhancing the model's ability to discern subtle semantic distinctions. In this work, we introduce a Multi-Granularity Hard-negative (MGH) synthesis framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate diverse negative samples with varying levels of similarity with the query. This approach facilitates a coarse-to-fine curriculum learning strategy during supervised training, allowing the embedding model to progressively learn more nuanced semantic representations. Meanwhile, we propose an Anchor Token Aware (ATA) pooling method that assigns higher weights to anchor tokens based on aggregation patterns observed in LLMs, improving text embedding accuracy without increasing model complexity. Comprehensive experiments on the MTEB benchmark demonstrate that our methods achieve state-of-the-art performance, surpassing existing synthesis strategies both with synthetic data and when combined with public retrieval datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2025.

Builds on

23 of 33 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  2. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  3. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
  4. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
  5. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
  6. 2023C-Pack: Packed Resources For General Chinese Embeddingscited by 578
  7. 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 575
  8. 2023OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocationcited by 478
  9. 2024NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Modelscited by 472
  10. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 456
  11. 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 404
  12. 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 361
11 more
  1. 2023Fine-Tuning LLaMA for Multi-Stage Text Retrievalcited by 272
  2. 2023Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context Learningcited by 236
  3. 2022Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examplescited by 235
  4. 2019Document Expansion by Query Predictioncited by 231
  5. 2022SGPT: GPT Sentence Embeddings for Semantic Searchcited by 204
  6. 2024jina-embeddings-v3: Multilingual Embeddings With Task LoRAcited by 141
  7. 2021Mr. TyDi: A Multi-lingual Benchmark for Dense Retrievalcited by 119
  8. 2024Making Text Embedders Few-Shot Learnerscited by 79
  9. 2023InPars-v2: Large Language Models as Efficient Dataset Generators for Information Retrievalcited by 73
  10. 2024Leveraging LLMs for Unsupervised Dense Retriever Rankingcited by 19
  11. 2024Little Giants: Synthesizing High-Quality Embedding Data at Scalecited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.