mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pilot Study on Generative AI and Critical Thinking in Higher Education Classrooms

arXiv 2509.00167 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2025cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative AI (GAI) tools have seen rapid adoption in educational settings, yet their role in fostering critical thinking remains underexplored. While previous studies have examined GAI as a tutor for specific lessons or as a tool for completing assignments, few have addressed how students critically evaluate the accuracy and appropriateness of GAI-generated responses. This pilot study investigates students' ability to apply structured critical thinking when assessing Generative AI outputs in introductory Computational and Data Science courses. Given that GAI tools often produce contextually flawed or factually incorrect answers, we designed learning activities that require students to analyze, critique, and revise AI-generated solutions. Our findings offer initial insights into students' ability to engage critically with GAI content and lay the groundwork for more comprehensive studies in future semesters.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2025.

Builds on

4 of 45 references.

References · 4

  1. 2025Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Taskcited by 106
  2. 2023Students' Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Educationcited by 41
  3. 2024Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024cited by 24
  4. 2024Artificial Intelligence Policy Framework for Institutionscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.