mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PAX-TS: Model-agnostic multi-granular explanations for time series forecasting via localized perturbations

arXiv 2508.18982 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time series forecasting has seen considerable improvement during the last years, with transformer models and large language models driving advancements of the state of the art. Modern forecasting models are generally opaque and do not provide explanations for their forecasts, while well-known post-hoc explainability methods like LIME are not suitable for the forecasting context. We propose PAX-TS, a model-agnostic post-hoc algorithm to explain time series forecasting models and their forecasts. Our method is based on localized input perturbations and results in multi-granular explanations. Further, it is able to characterize cross-channel correlations for multivariate time series forecasts. We clearly outline the algorithmic procedure behind PAX-TS, demonstrate it on a benchmark with 7 algorithms and 10 diverse datasets, compare it with two other state-of-the-art explanation algorithms, and present the different explanation types of the method. We found that the explanations of high-performing and low-performing algorithms differ on the same datasets, highlighting that the explanations of PAX-TS effectively capture a model's behavior. Based on time step correlation matrices resulting from the benchmark, we identify 6 classes of patterns that repeatedly occur across different datasets and algorithms. We found that the patterns are indicators of performance, with noticeable differences in forecasting error between the classes. Lastly, we outline a multivariate example where PAX-TS demonstrates how the forecasting model takes cross-channel correlations into account. With PAX-TS, time series forecasting models' mechanisms can be illustrated in different levels of detail, and its explanations can be used to answer practical questions on forecasts.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2025.

Builds on

14 of 31 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  2. 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,169
  3. 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
  4. 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,424
  5. 2023iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecastingcited by 931
  6. 2017Modeling Long- and Short-Term Temporal Patterns with Deep Neural Networkscited by 879
  7. 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 761
  8. 2019N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecastingcited by 753
  9. 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 692
  10. 2024TimeMixer: Decomposable Multiscale Mixing for Time Series Forecastingcited by 346
  11. 2018Multilevel Wavelet Decomposition Network for Interpretable Time Series Analysiscited by 61
  12. 2023SegRNN: Segment Recurrent Neural Network for Long-Term Time Series Forecastingcited by 55
2 more
  1. 2021TS-MULE: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations for Time Series Forecast Modelscited by 28
  2. 2024Time-Series Foundation Models for Forecasting Soil Moisture Levels in Smart Agriculturecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.