mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SMITE: Enhancing Fairness in LLMs through Optimal In-Context Example Selection via Dynamic Validation

arXiv 2508.17735 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used for downstream tasks such as tabular classification, where ensuring fairness in their outputs is critical for inclusivity, equal representation, and responsible AI deployment. This study introduces a novel approach to enhancing LLM performance and fairness through the concept of a dynamic validation set, which evolves alongside the test set, replacing the traditional static validation approach. We also propose an iterative algorithm, SMITE, to select optimal in-context examples, with each example set validated against its corresponding dynamic validation set. The in-context set with the lowest total error is used as the final demonstration set. Our experiments across four different LLMs show that our proposed techniques significantly improve both predictive accuracy and fairness compared to baseline methods. To our knowledge, this is the first study to apply dynamic validation in the context of in-context learning for LLMs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
  4. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
  5. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,055
  6. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  7. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  8. 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 518
  9. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
  10. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 486
  11. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  12. 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
12 more
  1. 2022Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Modelscited by 210
  2. 2020Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilitiescited by 182
  3. 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendationcited by 114
  4. 2023Finding Support Examples for In-Context Learningcited by 104
  5. 2019Evaluating the Underlying Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 94
  6. 2021It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarkscited by 61
  7. 2023Bias Testing and Mitigation in LLM-based Code Generationcited by 53
  8. 2021Uncovering Implicit Gender Bias in Narratives through Commonsense Inferencecited by 32
  9. 2023TABLET: Learning From Instructions For Tabular Datacited by 28
  10. 2024Few-Shot Fairness: Unveiling LLM's Potential for Fairness-Aware Classificationcited by 18
  11. 2023Confronting LLMs with Traditional ML: Rethinking the Fairness of Large Language Models in Tabular Classificationscited by 15
  12. 2024Misconfidence-based Demonstration Selection for LLM In-Context Learningcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.