mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explainable AI (XAI) for Arrhythmia detection from electrocardiograms

arXiv 2508.17294 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Advancements in deep learning have enabled highly accurate arrhythmia detection from electrocardiogram (ECG) signals, but limited interpretability remains a barrier to clinical adoption. This study investigates the application of Explainable AI (XAI) techniques specifically adapted for time-series ECG analysis. Using the MIT-BIH arrhythmia dataset, a convolutional neural network-based model was developed for arrhythmia classification, with R-peak-based segmentation via the Pan-Tompkins algorithm. To increase the dataset size and to reduce class imbalance, an additional 12-lead ECG dataset was incorporated. A user needs assessment was carried out to identify what kind of explanation would be preferred by medical professionals. Medical professionals indicated a preference for saliency map-based explanations over counterfactual visualisations, citing clearer correspondence with ECG interpretation workflows. Four SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based approaches: permutation importance, KernelSHAP, gradient-based methods, and Deep Learning Important FeaTures (DeepLIFT), were implemented and compared. The model achieved 98.3% validation accuracy on MIT-BIH but showed performance degradation on the combined dataset, underscoring dataset variability challenges. Permutation importance and KernelSHAP produced cluttered visual outputs, while gradient-based and DeepLIFT methods highlighted waveform regions consistent with clinical reasoning, but with variability across samples. Findings emphasize the need for domain-specific XAI adaptations in ECG analysis and highlight saliency mapping as a more clinically intuitive approach

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2025.

Builds on

3 of 25 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  2. 2019Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Seriescited by 67
  3. 2019Evaluating Explanation Without Ground Truth in Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 29

Built on by

Not cited yet.