mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LLMs that Understand Processes: Instruction-tuning for Semantics-Aware Process Mining

arXiv 2508.16270 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Process mining is increasingly using textual information associated with events to tackle tasks such as anomaly detection and process discovery. Such semantics-aware process mining focuses on what behavior should be possible in a process (i.e., expectations), thus providing an important complement to traditional, frequency-based techniques that focus on recorded behavior (i.e., reality). Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a powerful means for tackling semantics-aware tasks. However, the best performance is so far achieved through task-specific fine-tuning, which is computationally intensive and results in models that can only handle one specific task. To overcome this lack of generalization, we use this paper to investigate the potential of instruction-tuning for semantics-aware process mining. The idea of instruction-tuning here is to expose an LLM to prompt-answer pairs for different tasks, e.g., anomaly detection and next-activity prediction, making it more familiar with process mining, thus allowing it to also perform better at unseen tasks, such as process discovery. Our findings demonstrate a varied impact of instruction-tuning: while performance considerably improved on process discovery and prediction tasks, it varies across models on anomaly detection tasks, highlighting that the selection of tasks for instruction-tuning is critical to achieving desired outcomes.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2025.

Builds on

19 of 28 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  6. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 868
  7. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
  8. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 721
  9. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
  10. 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 623
  11. 2023Large Language Model Instruction Following: A Survey of Progresses and Challengescited by 31
  12. 2023Abstractions, Scenarios, and Prompt Definitions for Process Mining with LLMs: A Case Studycited by 20
7 more
  1. 2024PM-LLM-Benchmark: Evaluating Large Language Models on Process Mining Taskscited by 16
  2. 2022SAP Signavio Academic Models: A Large Process Model Datasetcited by 11
  3. 2024SNAP: Semantic Stories for Next Activity Predictioncited by 8
  4. 2024DABL: Detecting Semantic Anomalies in Business Processes Using Large Language Modelscited by 5
  5. 2024xSemAD: Explainable Semantic Anomaly Detection in Event Logs Using Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 4
  6. 2024Bridging Domain Knowledge and Process Discovery Using Large Language Modelscited by 4
  7. 2025On the Potential of Large Language Models to Solve Semantics-Aware Process Mining Taskscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.