DABL: Detecting Semantic Anomalies in Business Processes Using Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detecting anomalies in business processes is crucial for ensuring operational success. While many existing methods rely on statistical frequency to detect anomalies, it's important to note that infrequent behavior doesn't necessarily imply undesirability. To address this challenge, detecting anomalies from a semantic viewpoint proves to be a more effective approach. However, current semantic anomaly detection methods treat a trace (i.e., process instance) as multiple event pairs, disrupting long-distance dependencies. In this paper, we introduce DABL, a novel approach for detecting semantic anomalies in business processes using large language models (LLMs). We collect 143,137 real-world process models from various domains. By generating normal traces through the playout of these process models and simulating both ordering and exclusion anomalies, we fine-tune Llama 2 using the resulting log. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that DABL surpasses existing state-of-the-art semantic anomaly detection methods in terms of both generalization ability and learning of given processes. Users can directly apply DABL to detect semantic anomalies in their own datasets without the need for additional training. Furthermore, DABL offers the capability to interpret the causes of anomalies in natural language, providing valuable insights into the detected anomalies.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2024.
Builds on
12 of 49 references.
References · 12
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2022GLM-130B: An Open Bilingual Pre-trained Modelcited by 843
- 2023Fake News in Sheep's Clothing: Robust Fake News Detection Against LLM-Empowered Style Attackscited by 70
- 2019Process Mining for Python (PM4Py): Bridging the Gap Between Process- and Data Sciencecited by 33
- 2019BINet: Multi-perspective Business Process Anomaly Classificationcited by 13
- 2022SAP Signavio Academic Models: A Large Process Model Datasetcited by 11
- 2020Translating Workflow Nets to Process Trees: An Algorithmic Approachcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4.
5 papers.
- 2024LogLLM: Log-based Anomaly Detection Using Large Language Modelscited by 22
- 2025Foundation Models for Anomaly Detection: Vision and Challengescited by 3
- 2025LLMs that Understand Processes: Instruction-tuning for Semantics-Aware Process Miningcited by 2
- 2025Leveraging GPT-4o Efficiency for Detecting Rework Anomaly in Business Processescited by 0
- 2025Detecting Undesired Process Behavior by Means of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 0
- 2025LLMs that Understand Processes: Instruction-tuning for Semantics-Aware Process Mining22 Aug 2025
- 2025Detecting Undesired Process Behavior by Means of Retrieval Augmented Generation28 May 2025
- 2025Leveraging GPT-4o Efficiency for Detecting Rework Anomaly in Business Processes10 Feb 2025
- 2025Foundation Models for Anomaly Detection: Vision and Challenges10 Feb 2025
- 2024LogLLM: Log-based Anomaly Detection Using Large Language Models13 Nov 2024