mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Investigation of D-Wave quantum annealing for training Restricted Boltzmann Machines and mitigating catastrophic forgetting

arXiv 2508.15697 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2025cs.LG quant-ph stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modest statistical differences between the sampling performances of the D-Wave quantum annealer (QA) and the classical Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), when applied to Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs), are explored to explain, and possibly address, the absence of significant and consistent improvements in RBM trainability when the D-Wave sampling was used in previous investigations. A novel hybrid sampling approach, combining the classical and the QA contributions, is investigated as a promising way to benefit from the modest differences between the two sampling methods. No improvements in the RBM training are achieved in this work, thereby suggesting that the differences between the QA-based and MCMC sampling, mainly found in the medium-to-low probability regions of the distribution, which are less important for the quality of the sample, are insufficient to benefit the training. Difficulties in achieving sufficiently high quality of embedding RBMs into the lattice of the newer generation of D-Wave hardware could be further complicating the task. On the other hand, the ability to generate samples of sufficient variety from lower-probability parts of the distribution has a potential to benefit other machine learning applications, such as the mitigation of catastrophic forgetting (CF) during incremental learning. The feasibility of using QA-generated patterns of desirable classes for CF mitigation by the generative replay is demonstrated in this work for the first time. While the efficiency of the CF mitigation using the D-Wave QA was comparable to that of the classical mitigation, both the speed of generating a large number of distinct desirable patterns and the potential for further improvement make this approach promising for a variety of challenging machine learning applications.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2025.

Builds on

19 of 47 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
  2. 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
  3. 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
  4. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
  5. 2019Learning to Remember: A Synaptic Plasticity Driven Framework for Continual Learningcited by 182
  6. 2018Generative replay with feedback connections as a general strategy for continual learningcited by 104
  7. 2018Memory Replay GANs: learning to generate images from new categories without forgettingcited by 77
  8. 2021Replay in Deep Learning: Current Approaches and Missing Biological Elementscited by 72
  9. 2025Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 55
  10. 2015Application of Quantum Annealing to Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 37
  11. 2016Neurogenesis Deep Learningcited by 32
  12. 2020Training and Classification using a Restricted Boltzmann Machine on the D-Wave 2000Qcited by 18
7 more
  1. 2019S-TRIGGER: Continual State Representation Learning via Self-Triggered Generative Replaycited by 7
  2. 2016Benchmarking Quantum Hardware for Training of Fully Visible Boltzmann Machinescited by 5
  3. 2019Comparison of D-Wave Quantum Annealing and Classical Simulated Annealing for Local Minima Determinationcited by 5
  4. 2019Towards Sampling from Nondirected Probabilistic Graphical models using a D-Wave Quantum Annealercited by 3
  5. 2023A hybrid quantum-classical approach for inference on restricted Boltzmann machinescited by 3
  6. 2020Quantum Semantic Learning by Reverse Annealing an Adiabatic Quantum Computercited by 1
  7. 2025Comparison of D-Wave Quantum Annealing and Gibbs Monte Carlo for Sampling from a Probability Distribution of a Restricted Boltzmann Machinecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.