mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ambiguity Resolution with Human Feedback for Code Writing Tasks

arXiv 2508.14114 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2025cs.SE cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Specifications for code writing tasks are usually expressed in natural language and may be ambiguous. Programmers must therefore develop the ability to recognize ambiguities in task specifications and resolve them by asking clarifying questions. We present and evaluate a prototype system, based on a novel technique (ARHF: Ambiguity Resolution with Human Feedback), that (1) suggests specific inputs on which a given task specification may be ambiguous, (2) seeks limited human feedback about the code's desired behavior on those inputs, and (3) uses this feedback to generate code that resolves these ambiguities. We evaluate the efficacy of our prototype, and we discuss the implications of such assistive systems on Computer Science education.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2025.

Builds on

8 of 16 references.

References · 8

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  2. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
  3. 2022Programming Is Hard -- Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities And Challenges of AI Code Generationcited by 99
  4. 2023The Robots are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in Computing Educationcited by 86
  5. 2022Interactive Code Generation via Test-Driven User-Intent Formalizationcited by 50
  6. 2024Do LLMs "know" internally when they follow instructions?cited by 26
  7. 2024Probeable Problems for Beginner-level Programming-with-AI Contestscited by 2
  8. 2025Probing the Unknown: Exploring Student Interactions with Probeable Problems at Scale in Introductory Programmingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ClarEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Clarification Skills of Code Agents under Ambiguous Instructions
  2. 2025A Comparative Study of Student Perspectives on Technical Writing Feedback Quality: Evaluating LLMs, SLMs, and Humans in Computer Science Topics
  3. 2020Effects of Human vs. Automatic Feedback on Students' Understanding of AI Concepts and Programming Style
  4. 2026Human-in-the-Loop Control of Objective Drift in LLM-Assisted Computer Science Education
  5. 2026An Explainable AI Assistant for Introductory Programming Education: Improving Feedback Reliability with Instructor-AI Collaboration
  6. 2023GuardRails: Automated Suggestions for Clarifying Ambiguous Purpose Statements
  7. 2026Consistently Good vs. Occasionally Great: A Rubric for Open-Ended Feedback Quality from Humans and Machines ↗
  8. 2025Partnering with AI: A Pedagogical Feedback System for LLM Integration into Programming Education