From Scores to Skills: A Cognitive Diagnosis Framework for Evaluating Financial Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise for financial applications, yet their suitability for this high-stakes domain remains largely unproven due to inadequacies in existing benchmarks. Existing benchmarks solely rely on score-level evaluation, summarizing performance with a single score that obscures the nuanced understanding of what models truly know and their precise limitations. They also rely on datasets that cover only a narrow subset of financial concepts, while overlooking other essentials for real-world applications. To address these gaps, we introduce FinCDM, the first cognitive diagnosis evaluation framework tailored for financial LLMs, enabling the evaluation of LLMs at the knowledge-skill level, identifying what financial skills and knowledge they have or lack based on their response patterns across skill-tagged tasks, rather than a single aggregated number. We construct CPA-KQA, the first cognitively informed financial evaluation dataset derived from the Certified Public Accountant (CPA) examination, with comprehensive coverage of real-world accounting and financial skills. It is rigorously annotated by domain experts, who author, validate, and annotate questions with high inter-annotator agreement and fine-grained knowledge labels. Our extensive experiments on 30 proprietary, open-source, and domain-specific LLMs show that FinCDM reveals hidden knowledge gaps, identifies under-tested areas such as tax and regulatory reasoning overlooked by traditional benchmarks, and uncovers behavioral clusters among models. FinCDM introduces a new paradigm for financial LLM evaluation by enabling interpretable, skill-aware diagnosis that supports more trustworthy and targeted model development, and all datasets and evaluation scripts will be publicly released to support further research.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets?cited by 44
- 2025FinSearchComp: Towards a Realistic, Expert-Level Evaluation of Financial Search and Reasoningcited by 27
- 2025How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patternscited by 8
- 2026FinFIRST: Benchmarking Search Agents for Financial Information Retrieval, Sourcing and Traceabilitycited by 0
- 2026RSI-Master: Structuring Experiments to Guide Autonomous Model Improvementcited by 0
- 2026RSI-Master: Structuring Experiments to Guide Autonomous Model Improvement28 Sep 2026
- 2026FinFIRST: Benchmarking Search Agents for Financial Information Retrieval, Sourcing and Traceability21 Sep 2026
- 2025How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patterns30 Dec 2025
- 2025StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets?2 Oct 2025
- 2025FinSearchComp: Towards a Realistic, Expert-Level Evaluation of Financial Search and Reasoning16 Sep 2025