EvolMathEval: Towards Evolvable Benchmarks for Mathematical Reasoning via Evolutionary Testing
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) poses a significant challenge to existing mathematical reasoning benchmarks. However, these benchmarks tend to become easier over time as LLMs can learn from the published benchmarks. This limitation hinder the precise evaluation of the true capabilities of SOTA models. To address this challenge, this paper introduces EvolMathEval, an automated mathematical benchmark generation and evolution framework based on evolutionary testing. Experimental results demonstrate that EvolMathEval can not only generate a large volume of high-difficulty problems through continuous self-iteration, but it can also significantly enhance the complexity of public datasets like GSM8K through evolution, reducing model accuracy by an average of 48%. Deeper investigation reveals that when solving these evolved problems, LLMs tend to bypass complex multi-step logical reasoning by relying on simplistic and fuzzy conditions, consequently leading to incorrect solutions. We define this phenomenon as the ``Pseudo Aha Moment", which we find accounts for 77% to 100% of errors on targeted problems. Code and resources are available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/EvolMathEval
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2025.
Builds on
12 of 30 references.
References · 12
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229
- 2024MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmarkcited by 105
- 2024Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Modelscited by 91
- 2025Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contaminationcited by 82
- 2023NPHardEval: Dynamic Benchmark on Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models via Complexity Classescited by 79
- 2024Agents4PLC: Automating Closed-loop PLC Code Generation and Verification in Industrial Control Systems using LLM-based Agentscited by 26
- 2024VISTA: Visual Integrated System for Tailored Automation in Math Problem Generation Using LLMcited by 8
- 2025AutoEvoEval: An Automated Framework for Evolving Close-Ended LLM Evaluation Datacited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Population-Evolve: a Parallel Sampling and Evolutionary Method for LLM Math Reasoning
- 2026D'ej`aQ: Open-Ended Evolution of Diverse, Learnable and Verifiable Problems
- 2025EvolProver: Advancing Automated Theorem Proving by Evolving Formalized Problems via Symmetry and Difficulty
- 2025Self-Evolved Preference Optimization for Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Small Language Models
- 2025ReliableMath: Benchmark of Reliable Mathematical Reasoning on Large Language Models
- 2025Mathematical exploration and discovery at scale
- 2025Evolutionary thoughts: integration of large language models and evolutionary algorithms
- 2026CoTEvol: Self-Evolving Chain-of-Thoughts for Data Synthesis in Mathematical Reasoning