ATLAS: AI-Native Receiver Test-and-Measurement by Leveraging AI-Guided Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Industry adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-native wireless receivers, or even modular, Machine Learning (ML)-aided wireless signal processing blocks, has been slow. The main concern is the lack of explainability of these trained ML models and the significant risks posed to network functionalities in case of failures, especially since (i) testing on every exhaustive case is infeasible and (ii) the data used for model training may not be available. This paper proposes ATLAS, an AI-guided approach that generates a battery of tests for pre-trained AI-native receiver models and benchmarks the performance against a classical receiver architecture. Using gradient-based optimization, it avoids spanning the exhaustive set of all environment and channel conditions; instead, it generates the next test in an online manner to further probe specific configurations that offer the highest risk of failure. We implement and validate our approach by adopting the well-known DeepRx AI-native receiver model as well as a classical receiver using differentiable tensors in NVIDIA's Sionna environment. ATLAS uncovers specific combinations of mobility, channel delay spread, and noise, where fully and partially trained variants of AI-native DeepRx perform suboptimally compared to the classical receivers. Our proposed method reduces the number of tests required per failure found by 19% compared to grid search for a 3-parameters input optimization problem, demonstrating greater efficiency. In contrast, the computational cost of the grid-based approach scales exponentially with the number of variables, making it increasingly impractical for high-dimensional problems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2025.
Builds on
12 of 21 references.
References · 12
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 582
- 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 446
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
- 2022Sionna: An Open-Source Library for Next-Generation Physical Layer Researchcited by 145
- 2018Deep Learning in Mobile and Wireless Networking: A Surveycited by 118
- 2020Toward a 6G AI-Native Air Interfacecited by 55
- 2020DeepRx: Fully Convolutional Deep Learning Receivercited by 52
- 2020Deep Learning for Wireless Communications: An Emerging Interdisciplinary Paradigmcited by 20
- 2021Explaining deep learning models for spoofing and deepfake detection with SHapley Additive exPlanationscited by 13
- 2022Robust Bayesian Learning for Reliable Wireless AI: Framework and Applicationscited by 9
- 2022Neural Network-based OFDM Receiver for Resource Constrained IoT Devicescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.