Impact of Clinical Image Quality on Efficient Foundation Model Finetuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models in medical imaging have shown promising label efficiency, achieving high performance on downstream tasks using only a fraction of the annotated data otherwise required. In this study, we evaluate this potential in the context of prostate multiparametric MRI using ProFound, a recently developed domain-specific vision foundation model pretrained on large-scale prostate MRI datasets. We investigate the impact of variable image quality on the label-efficient finetuning, by quantifying the generalisability of the finetuned models. We conduct a comprehensive set of experiments by systematically varying the ratios of high- and low-quality images in the finetuning and evaluation sets. Our findings indicate that image quality distribution and its finetune-and-test mismatch significantly affect model performance. In particular: a) Varying the ratio of high- to low-quality images between finetuning and test sets leads to notable differences in downstream performance; and b) The presence of sufficient high-quality images in the finetuning set is critical for maintaining strong performance, whilst the importance of matched finetuning and testing distribution varies between different downstream tasks, such as automated radiology reporting and prostate cancer detection. Importantly, experimental results also show that, although finetuning requires significantly less labeled data compared to training from scratch when the quality ratio is consistent, this label efficiency is not independent of the image quality distribution. For example, we show cases that, without sufficient high-quality images in finetuning, finetuned models may fail to outperform those without pretraining.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2025.
Builds on
10 of 27 references.
References · 10
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 712
- 2023On the Challenges and Perspectives of Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysiscited by 135
- 2023SAM-Med3D: Towards General-purpose Segmentation Models for Volumetric Medical Imagescited by 107
- 2024Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentation: Current Applications and Future Directionscited by 97
- 2023SegVol: Universal and Interactive Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 87
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Foundation Models in Medicinecited by 56
- 2024Representing Part-Whole Hierarchies in Foundation Models by Learning Localizability, Composability, and Decomposability from Anatomy via Self-Supervisioncited by 13
- 2023Empirical Analysis of a Segmentation Foundation Model in Prostate Imagingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026ProFound: A moderate-sized vision foundation model for multi-task prostate imagingcited by 2
- 2026Maximizing T2-Only Prostate Cancer Localization from Expected Diffusion Weighted Imagingcited by 0
- 2026Bridging Single Distortion Artifacts and Multifactorial Clinical Quality: Few-shot Biparametric MRI Quality Assessment via Distortion-trained Prototypical Networkscited by 0
- 2026Bridging Single Distortion Artifacts and Multifactorial Clinical Quality: Few-shot Biparametric MRI Quality Assessment via Distortion-trained Prototypical Networks17 Jun 2026
- 2026Maximizing T2-Only Prostate Cancer Localization from Expected Diffusion Weighted Imaging1 Apr 2026
- 2026ProFound: A moderate-sized vision foundation model for multi-task prostate imaging4 Mar 2026