mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CTRL Your Shift: Clustered Transfer Residual Learning for Many Small Datasets

arXiv 2508.11144 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) tasks often utilize large-scale data that is drawn from several distinct sources, such as different locations, treatment arms, or groups. In such settings, practitioners often desire predictions that not only exhibit good overall accuracy, but also remain reliable within each source and preserve the differences that matter across sources. For instance, several asylum and refugee resettlement programs now use ML-based employment predictions to guide where newly arriving families are placed within a host country, which requires generating informative and differentiated predictions for many and often small source locations. However, this task is made challenging by several common characteristics of the data in these settings: the presence of numerous distinct data sources, distributional shifts between them, and substantial variation in sample sizes across sources. This paper introduces Clustered Transfer Residual Learning (CTRL), a meta-learning method that combines the strengths of cross-domain residual learning and adaptive pooling/clustering in order to simultaneously improve overall accuracy and preserve source-level heterogeneity. We establish new theory showing that high-quality clusters can be learned efficiently, bypassing the need for repeated model refitting over candidate subsets. We evaluate CTRL alongside other state-of-the-art benchmarks on 5 large-scale datasets. This includes a dataset from the national asylum program in Switzerland, where the algorithmic geographic assignment of asylum seekers is currently being piloted. CTRL consistently outperforms the benchmarks across several key metrics and when using a range of different base learners.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2025.

Builds on

16 of 37 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  2. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  3. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  4. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
  5. 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
  6. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
  7. 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 399
  8. 2016Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Residual Transfer Networkscited by 341
  9. 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 332
  10. 2024Data Mixing Laws: Optimizing Data Mixtures by Predicting Language Modeling Performancecited by 184
  11. 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 178
  12. 2021Evaluating Treatment Prioritization Rules via Rank-Weighted Average Treatment Effectscited by 31
4 more
  1. 2020Outcome-Driven Dynamic Refugee Assignment with Allocation Balancingcited by 6
  2. 2023Generating Synthetic Datasets by Interpolating along Generalized Geodesicscited by 5
  3. 2024Out-of-distribution generalization under random, dense distributional shiftscited by 5
  4. 2024Minimax Regret Estimation for Generalizing Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Multisite Datacited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.