mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-Prompt Encoder for Low-Performing Languages

arXiv 2508.10352 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Soft prompts have emerged as a powerful alternative to adapters in parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT), enabling large language models (LLMs) to adapt to downstream tasks without architectural changes or parameter updates. While prior work has focused on stabilizing training via parameter interaction in small neural prompt encoders, their broader potential for transfer across languages remains unexplored. In this paper, we demonstrate that a prompt encoder can play a central role in improving performance on low-performing languages - those that achieve poor accuracy even under full-model fine-tuning. We investigate a lightweight encoder paired with multi-source training on typologically diverse languages. We call this architecture-training combination the Cross-Prompt Encoder (XPE), and show that it advances the capture of abstract, transferable patterns across languages. To complement XPE, we propose a Dual Soft Prompt mechanism that combines an encoder-based prompt with a directly trained standard soft prompt. This hybrid design proves especially effective for target languages that benefit from both broadly shared structure and language-specific alignment. Text classification experiments with a transformer encoder (XLM-R) on the SIB-200 benchmark reveal a consistent trade-off: XPE is most effective for low-performing languages, while hybrid variants offer broader adaptability across multilingual settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2025.

Builds on

23 of 30 references.

References · 23

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  3. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  4. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  5. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,818
  6. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
  7. 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 798
  8. 2020XTREME: A Massively Multilingual Multi-task Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-lingual Generalizationcited by 742
  9. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 656
  10. 2020MAD-X: An Adapter-Based Framework for Multi-Task Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 445
  11. 2023SIB-200: A Simple, Inclusive, and Big Evaluation Dataset for Topic Classification in 200+ Languages and Dialectscited by 152
  12. 2021Composable Sparse Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 144
11 more
  1. 2023Multitask Prompt Tuning Enables Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 115
  2. 2023Residual Prompt Tuning: Improving Prompt Tuning with Residual Reparameterizationcited by 64
  3. 2021Consistency Regularization for Cross-Lingual Fine-Tuningcited by 41
  4. 2024Understanding Cross-Lingual Alignment -- A Surveycited by 34
  5. 2022Zero-shot Cross-lingual Transfer of Prompt-based Tuning with a Unified Multilingual Promptcited by 25
  6. 2023Enhancing Cross-lingual Natural Language Inference by Soft Prompting with Multilingual Verbalizercited by 7
  7. 2024Soft Prompt Tuning for Cross-Lingual Transfer: When Less is Morecited by 7
  8. 2024Cross-Lingual Transfer for Natural Language Inference via Multilingual Prompt Translatorcited by 3
  9. 2025Language Fusion for Parameter-Efficient Cross-lingual Transfercited by 3
  10. 2025Enhancing Small Language Models for Cross-Lingual Generalized Zero-Shot Classification with Soft Prompt Tuningcited by 3
  11. 2025DeFTX: Denoised Sparse Fine-Tuning for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.