Cognitive Cybersecurity for Artificial Intelligence: Guardrail Engineering with CCS-7
On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models exhibit human-like cognitive vulnerabilities, such as emotional framing, that escape traditional behavioral alignment. We present CCS-7 (Cognitive Cybersecurity Suite), a taxonomy of seven vulnerabilities grounded in human cognitive security research. To establish a human benchmark, we ran a randomized controlled trial with 151 participants: a "Think First, Verify Always" (TFVA) lesson improved cognitive security by +7.9% overall. We then evaluated TFVA-style guardrails across 12,180 experiments on seven diverse language model architectures. Results reveal architecture-dependent risk patterns: some vulnerabilities (e.g., identity confusion) are almost fully mitigated, while others (e.g., source interference) exhibit escalating backfire, with error rates increasing by up to 135% in certain models. Humans, in contrast, show consistent moderate improvement. These findings reframe cognitive safety as a model-specific engineering problem: interventions effective in one architecture may fail, or actively harm, another, underscoring the need for architecture-aware cognitive safety testing before deployment.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 7 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2025.
Builds on
7 of 31 references.
References · 7
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
- 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 964
- 2022Capturing Failures of Large Language Models via Human Cognitive Biasescited by 98
- 2025"Think First, Verify Always": Training Humans to Face AI Riskscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Silicon Psyche: Anthropomorphic Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models
- 2026Benchmarking Jailbreak Guardrails for Embodied Agents
- 2026ADVERSA: Measuring Multi-Turn Guardrail Degradation and Judge Reliability in Large Language Models
- 2026Triaging Threats to Specialized Guardrails
- 2026Towards Modeling Cybersecurity Behavior of Humans in Organizations ↗
- 2026TWGuard: A Case Study of LLM Safety Guardrails for Localized Linguistic Contexts
- 2026Cognitive Firewall: A Proactive, Zero-Trust, Multi-Gate Framework for LLM Safety
- 2025Breaking Minds, Breaking Systems: Jailbreaking Large Language Models via Human-like Psychological Manipulation