mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

JustDense: Just using Dense instead of Sequence Mixer for Time Series analysis

arXiv 2508.09153 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sequence and channel mixers, the core mechanism in sequence models, have become the de facto standard in time series analysis (TSA). However, recent studies have questioned the necessity of complex sequence mixers, such as attention mechanisms, demonstrating that simpler architectures can achieve comparable or even superior performance. This suggests that the benefits attributed to complex sequencemixers might instead emerge from other architectural or optimization factors. Based on this observation, we pose a central question: Are common sequence mixers necessary for time-series analysis? Therefore, we propose JustDense, an empirical study that systematically replaces sequence mixers in various well-established TSA models with dense layers. Grounded in the MatrixMixer framework, JustDense treats any sequence mixer as a mixing matrix and replaces it with a dense layer. This substitution isolates the mixing operation, enabling a clear theoretical foundation for understanding its role. Therefore, we conducted extensive experiments on 29 benchmarks covering five representative TSA tasks using seven state-of-the-art TSA models to address our research question. The results show that replacing sequence mixers with dense layers yields comparable or even superior performance. In the cases where dedicated sequence mixers still offer benefits, JustDense challenges the assumption that "deeper and more complex architectures are inherently better" in TSA.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.

Builds on

22 of 37 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  4. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,465
  5. 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,169
  6. 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
  7. 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,676
  8. 2020Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexitycited by 1,474
  9. 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,424
  10. 2024Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Dualitycited by 1,336
  11. 2023iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecastingcited by 931
  12. 2017Modeling Long- and Short-Term Temporal Patterns with Deep Neural Networkscited by 879
10 more
  1. 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 410
  2. 2018The UEA multivariate time series classification archive, 2018cited by 338
  3. 2024xLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memorycited by 327
  4. 2023TSMixer: An All-MLP Architecture for Time Series Forecastingcited by 240
  5. 2024Deep Time Series Models: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmarkcited by 197
  6. 2024Is Mamba Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 114
  7. 2024Hydra: Bidirectional State Space Models Through Generalized Matrix Mixerscited by 44
  8. 2020Gradient Descent for Deep Matrix Factorization: Dynamics and Implicit Bias towards Low Rankcited by 42
  9. 2023PatchMixer: A Patch-Mixing Architecture for Long-Term Time Series Forecastingcited by 20
  10. 2018Learning Compressed Transforms with Low Displacement Rankcited by 19

Built on by

Not cited yet.