Reducing Cognitive Overhead in Tool Use via Multi-Small-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in multi-agent systems highlight the potential of specialized small agents that collaborate via division of labor. Existing tool-integrated reasoning systems, however, often follow a single-agent paradigm in which one large model interleaves long-horizon reasoning with precise tool operations, leading to cognitive-load interference and unstable coordination. We present MSARL, a Multi-Small-Agent Reinforcement Learning framework that explicitly decouples reasoning from tool use. In MSARL, a Reasoning Agent decomposes problems and plans tool invocations, while multiple Tool Agents specialize in specific external tools, each trained via a combination of imitation learning and reinforcement learning with role-specific rewards. On mathematical problem solving with code execution, MSARL significantly improves reasoning stability and final-answer accuracy over single-agent baselines. Moreover, the architecture generalizes to diverse tool-use tasks, demonstrating that cognitive-role decoupling with small agents is a scalable blueprint for multi-agent AI design.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2025.
Builds on
30 of 37 references.
References · 30
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 618
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 505
18 more
- 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewardscited by 478
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 424
- 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
- 2025ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needscited by 342
- 2023ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solvingcited by 276
- 2023Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinionscited by 250
- 2023MathCoder: Seamless Code Integration in LLMs for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoningcited by 155
- 2023OpenAgents: An Open Platform for Language Agents in the Wildcited by 136
- 2024LLM Multi-Agent Systems: Challenges and Open Problemscited by 119
- 2024G-Designer: Architecting Multi-agent Communication Topologies via Graph Neural Networkscited by 110
- 2025Agentic Reasoning: A Streamlined Framework for Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Agentic Toolscited by 106
- 2025Critique-GRPO: Advancing LLM Reasoning with Natural Language and Numerical Feedbackcited by 86
- 2024Language Agents as Optimizable Graphscited by 81
- 2024MALT: Improving Reasoning with Multi-Agent LLM Trainingcited by 71
- 2024MACM: Utilizing a Multi-Agent System for Condition Mining in Solving Complex Mathematical Problemscited by 41
- 2025ReSo: A Reward-driven Self-organizing LLM-based Multi-Agent System for Reasoning Taskscited by 30
- 2025Reinforce LLM Reasoning through Multi-Agent Reflectioncited by 26
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Code Generation: A Multi-Vocal Literature Reviewcited by 2
- 2026Complete Cyclic Subtask Graphs for Tool-Using LLM Agents: Flexibility, Cost, and Bottlenecks in Long-Horizon Workflowscited by 0
- 2026Spurious Tool Use: When RL Agents Learn the Wrong Reason to Actcited by 0
- 2026Spurious Tool Use: When RL Agents Learn the Wrong Reason to Act14 Sep 2026
- 2026Complete Cyclic Subtask Graphs for Tool-Using LLM Agents: Flexibility, Cost, and Bottlenecks in Long-Horizon Workflows17 Apr 2026
- 2026LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Code Generation: A Multi-Vocal Literature Review25 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Reasoning and Tool-use Compete in Agentic RL:From Quantifying Interference to Disentangled Tuning
- 2025Agentic Reasoning and Tool Integration for LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026MetaForge: A Self-Evolving Multimodal Agent that Retrieves, Adapts, and Forges Tools On Demand ↗
- 2026AdaTIR: Adaptive Tool-Integrated Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware Policy Optimization
- 2025AutoTool: Dynamic Tool Selection and Integration for Agentic Reasoning
- 2025Agent-as-Tool: A Study on the Hierarchical Decision Making with Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Acting Less is Reasoning More! Teaching Model to Act Efficiently
- 2026ToolRLA: Multiplicative Reward Decomposition for Tool-Integrated Agents