Evaluating Contrast Localizer for Identifying Causal Units in Social & Mathematical Tasks in Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
This work adapts a neuroscientific contrast localizer to pinpoint causally relevant units for Theory of Mind (ToM) and mathematical reasoning tasks in large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs). Across 11 LLMs and 5 VLMs ranging in size from 3B to 90B parameters, we localize top-activated units using contrastive stimulus sets and assess their causal role via targeted ablations. We compare the effect of lesioning functionally selected units against low-activation and randomly selected units on downstream accuracy across established ToM and mathematical benchmarks. Contrary to expectations, low-activation units sometimes produced larger performance drops than the highly activated ones, and units derived from the mathematical localizer often impaired ToM performance more than those from the ToM localizer. These findings call into question the causal relevance of contrast-based localizers and highlight the need for broader stimulus sets and more accurately capture task-specific units.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2025.
Builds on
15 of 42 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024The LLM Language Network: A Neuroscientific Approach for Identifying Causally Task-Relevant Units4 Nov
- 2024Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Survey17 Feb
- 2024OpenToM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Theory-of-Mind Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models8 Feb
- 2023A Survey of Reasoning with Foundation Models17 Dec
Other references · 11
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,614
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
- 2022Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMscited by 220
- 2023FANToM: A Benchmark for Stress-testing Machine Theory of Mind in Interactionscited by 171
- 2023Minding Language Models' (Lack of) Theory of Mind: A Plug-and-Play Multi-Character Belief Trackercited by 95
- 2024LLMs achieve adult human performance on higher-order theory of mind taskscited by 61
- 2023Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Examining Performance of 11 State-of-the-Art models vs. Children Aged 7-10 on Advanced Testscited by 48
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025What does it mean to understand language?cited by 0
- 2025What does it mean to understand language?24 Nov 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Mechanisms of Object Localization in Vision-Language Models
- 2023Visual cognition in multimodal large language models
- 2025Sensitivity Meets Sparsity: The Impact of Extremely Sparse Parameter Patterns on Theory-of-Mind of Large Language Models
- 2026On Emergent Social World Models -- Evidence for Functional Integration of Theory of Mind and Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Models
- 2026Beyond representational alignment with brain-guided language models for robust reasoning
- 2026Abstract representational geometry supports inference in large language models
- 2025What's Missing in Vision-Language Models? Probing Their Struggles with Causal Order Reasoning
- 2025On Representational Dissociation of Language and Arithmetic in Large Language Models