Detecting Mislabeled and Corrupted Data via Pointwise Mutual Information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks can memorize corrupted labels, making data quality critical for model performance, yet real-world datasets are frequently compromised by both label noise and input noise. This paper proposes a mutual information-based framework for data selection under hybrid noise scenarios that quantifies statistical dependencies between inputs and labels. We compute each sample's pointwise contribution to the overall mutual information and find that lower contributions indicate noisy or mislabeled instances. Empirical validation on MNIST with different synthetic noise settings demonstrates that the method effectively filters low-quality samples. Under label corruption, training on high-MI samples improves classification accuracy by up to 15% compared to random sampling. Furthermore, the method exhibits robustness to benign input modifications, preserving semantically valid data while filtering truly corrupted samples.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2025.
Builds on
32 of 49 references.
References · 32
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
20 more
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
- 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
- 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
- 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
- 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
- 2016Deep Learning over Multi-field Categorical Data: A Case Study on User Response Predictioncited by 67
- 2021Interactive Label Cleaning with Example-based Explanationscited by 49
- 2025Robot Data Curation with Mutual Information Estimatorscited by 37
- 2017DeepRank: A New Deep Architecture for Relevance Ranking in Information Retrievalcited by 21
- 2021Submodular Mutual Information for Targeted Data Subset Selectioncited by 8
- 2023Relabeling Minimal Training Subset to Flip a Predictioncited by 3
- 2024Statistical Undersampling with Mutual Information and Support Pointscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.