MSPT: A Lightweight Face Image Quality Assessment Method with Multi-stage Progressive Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurately assessing the perceptual quality of face images is crucial, especially with the rapid progress in face restoration and generation. Traditional quality assessment methods often struggle with the unique characteristics of face images, limiting their generalizability. While learning-based approaches demonstrate superior performance due to their strong fitting capabilities, their high complexity typically incurs significant computational and storage costs, hindering practical deployment. To address this, we propose a lightweight face quality assessment network with Multi-Stage Progressive Training (MSPT). Our network employs a three-stage progressive training strategy that gradually introduces more diverse data samples and increases input image resolution. This novel approach enables lightweight networks to achieve high performance by effectively learning complex quality features while significantly mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Our MSPT achieved the second highest score on the VQualA 2025 face image quality assessment benchmark dataset, demonstrating that MSPT achieves comparable or better performance than state-of-the-art methods while maintaining efficient inference.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2025.
Builds on
19 of 24 references.
References · 19
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
- 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,200
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,136
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2019GhostNet: More Features from Cheap Operationscited by 410
- 2019Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancycited by 209
- 2020Face Image Quality Assessment: A Literature Surveycited by 80
- 2021CR-FIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment by Learning Sample Relative Classifiabilitycited by 69
- 2021SDD-FIQA: Unsupervised Face Image Quality Assessment with Similarity Distribution Distancecited by 64
- 2020Rethinking Bottleneck Structure for Efficient Mobile Network Designcited by 54
- 2020Biometric Quality: Review and Application to Face Recognition with FaceQnetcited by 42
7 more
- 2024Lightweight Deep Learning for Resource-Constrained Environments: A Surveycited by 38
- 2021Continual Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 36
- 2021Searching for Fast Model Families on Datacenter Acceleratorscited by 22
- 2024DSL-FIQA: Assessing Facial Image Quality via Dual-Set Degradation Learning and Landmark-Guided Transformercited by 17
- 2021A strong baseline for image and video quality assessmentcited by 15
- 2021A Deep Insight into Measuring Face Image Utility with General and Face-specific Image Quality Metricscited by 13
- 2023Finding AI-Generated Faces in the Wildcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.