Anti-Tamper Protection for Unauthorized Individual Image Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the advancement of personalized image generation technologies, concerns about forgery attacks that infringe on portrait rights and privacy are growing. To address these concerns, protection perturbation algorithms have been developed to disrupt forgery generation. However, the protection algorithms would become ineffective when forgery attackers apply purification techniques to bypass the protection. To address this issue, we present a novel approach, Anti-Tamper Perturbation (ATP). ATP introduces a tamper-proof mechanism within the perturbation. It consists of protection and authorization perturbations, where the protection perturbation defends against forgery attacks, while the authorization perturbation detects purification-based tampering. Both protection and authorization perturbations are applied in the frequency domain under the guidance of a mask, ensuring that the protection perturbation does not disrupt the authorization perturbation. This design also enables the authorization perturbation to be distributed across all image pixels, preserving its sensitivity to purification-based tampering. ATP demonstrates its effectiveness in defending forgery attacks across various attack settings through extensive experiments, providing a robust solution for protecting individuals' portrait rights and privacy. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Seeyn/Anti-Tamper-Perturbation .
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.
Builds on
22 of 38 references.
References · 22
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2022DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generationcited by 3,300
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
- 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
- 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 914
- 2018HiDDeN: Hiding Data With Deep Networkscited by 397
10 more
- 2023SVDiff: Compact Parameter Space for Diffusion Fine-Tuningcited by 338
- 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 280
- 2023Adversarial Example Does Good: Preventing Painting Imitation from Diffusion Models via Adversarial Examplescited by 167
- 2023Anti-DreamBooth: Protecting users from personalized text-to-image synthesiscited by 120
- 2023EditGuard: Versatile Image Watermarking for Tamper Localization and Copyright Protectioncited by 111
- 2018Low Frequency Adversarial Perturbationcited by 80
- 2023MetaCloak: Preventing Unauthorized Subject-driven Text-to-image Diffusion-based Synthesis via Meta-learningcited by 44
- 2023Can Protective Perturbation Safeguard Personal Data from Being Exploited by Stable Diffusion?cited by 38
- 2024Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AIcited by 38
- 2024Perturbing Attention Gives You More Bang for the Buck: Subtle Imaging Perturbations That Efficiently Fool Customized Diffusion Modelscited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.