mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HCRide: Harmonizing Passenger Fairness and Driver Preference for Human-Centered Ride-Hailing

arXiv 2508.04811 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.SIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Order dispatch systems play a vital role in ride-hailing services, which directly influence operator revenue, driver profit, and passenger experience. Most existing work focuses on improving system efficiency in terms of operator revenue, which may cause a bad experience for both passengers and drivers. Hence, in this work, we aim to design a human-centered ride-hailing system by considering both passenger fairness and driver preference without compromising the overall system efficiency. However, it is nontrivial to achieve this target due to the potential conflicts between passenger fairness and driver preference since optimizing one may sacrifice the other. To address this challenge, we design HCRide, a Human-Centered Ride-hailing system based on a novel multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm called Harmonization-oriented Actor-Bi-Critic (Habic), which includes three major components (i.e., a multi-agent competition mechanism, a dynamic Actor network, and a Bi-Critic network) to optimize system efficiency and passenger fairness with driver preference consideration. We extensively evaluate our HCRide using two real-world ride-hailing datasets from Shenzhen and New York City. Experimental results show our HCRide effectively improves system efficiency by 2.02%, fairness by 5.39%, and driver preference by 10.21% compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.

Builds on

13 of 37 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 2,026
  4. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
  5. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 942
  6. 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 294
  7. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 190
  8. 2021Offline RL Without Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 151
  9. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Ridesharing: An Extended Surveycited by 35
  10. 2022Model-based Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning via a Constrained Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmcited by 29
  11. 2019Balancing the Tradeoff between Profit and Fairness in Rideshare Platforms During High-Demand Hourscited by 17
  12. 2021Survey of Recent Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Algorithms Utilizing Centralized Trainingcited by 16
1 more
  1. 2022Reinforcement Learning in the Wild: Scalable RL Dispatching Algorithm Deployed in Ridehailing Marketplacecited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LLM-ODDR: A Large Language Model Framework for Joint Order Dispatching and Driver Repositioning
  2. 2021Data-Driven Simulation of Ride-Hailing Services using Imitation and Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2024Assessing How Ride-hailing Rebalancing Strategies Improve the Resilience of Multi-modal Transportation Systems
  4. 2026ALIGN-HOLD: Experience Alignment for Real-Time Hold Control in Large-Scale Ride-Hailing Matching at DiDi
  5. 2024An End-to-End Reinforcement Learning Based Approach for Micro-View Order-Dispatching in Ride-Hailing
  6. 2025Timing the Match: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Ride-Hailing and Ride-Pooling Services
  7. 2019Optimal Passenger-Seeking Policies on E-hailing Platforms Using Markov Decision Process and Imitation Learning
  8. 2025Non-myopic Matching and Rebalancing in Large-Scale On-Demand Ride-Pooling Systems Using Simulation-Informed Reinforcement Learning