mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Before Humans Join the Team: Diagnosing Coordination Failures in Healthcare Robot Team Simulation

arXiv 2508.04691 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2025cs.RO cs.AI cs.MAcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As humans move toward collaborating with coordinated robot teams, understanding how these teams coordinate and fail is essential for building trust and ensuring safety. However, exposing human collaborators to coordination failures during early-stage development is costly and risky, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare. We adopt an agent-simulation approach in which all team roles, including the supervisory manager, are instantiated as LLM agents, allowing us to diagnose coordination failures before humans join the team. Using a controllable healthcare scenario, we conduct two studies with different hierarchical configurations to analyze coordination behaviors and failure patterns. Our findings reveal that team structure, rather than contextual knowledge or model capability, constitutes the primary bottleneck for coordination, and expose a tension between reasoning autonomy and system stability. By surfacing these failures in simulation, we prepare the groundwork for safe human integration. These findings inform the design of resilient robot teams with implications for process-level evaluation, transparent coordination protocols, and structured human integration. Supplementary materials, including codes, task agent setup, trace outputs, and annotated examples of coordination failures and reasoning behaviors, are available at: https://byc-sophie.github.io/mas-to-mars/.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.

Builds on

14 of 35 references.

References · 14

  1. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  2. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  3. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  4. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
  5. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 604
  6. 2025RAGEN: Understanding Self-Evolution in LLM Agents via Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 386
  7. 2025The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexitycited by 302
  8. 2024Mind Your Step (by Step): Chain-of-Thought can Reduce Performance on Tasks where Thinking Makes Humans Worsecited by 109
  9. 2025ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 79
  10. 2025Reinforce LLM Reasoning through Multi-Agent Reflectioncited by 27
  11. 2025Advancing Multi-Agent Systems Through Model Context Protocol: Architecture, Implementation, and Applicationscited by 23
  12. 2025Comprehensive Vulnerability Analysis is Necessary for Trustworthy LLM-MAScited by 8
2 more
  1. 2025Can Large Language Models Be Trusted Paper Reviewers? A Feasibility Studycited by 4
  2. 2025AutoGen Driven Multi Agent Framework for Iterative Crime Data Analysis and Predictioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Adaptive Human-Agent Teaming: A Review of Empirical Studies from the Process Dynamics Perspective
  2. 2022Coordination with Humans via Strategy Matching
  3. 2023Automated Task-Time Interventions to Improve Teamwork using Imitation Learning
  4. 2026Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
  5. 2026Beyond Perfect Teammates: Multi-Agent Collaboration with Unreliable Colleagues
  6. 2026HRIBench: Benchmarking Interaction-Centric Human-Robot Collaboration
  7. 2026TEAM-SimHRA: A Team-Based Simulation Framework for Human Reliability Analysis Using Multi-Agent Large Language Models
  8. 2026Visioning Human-Agentic AI Teaming: Continuity, Tension, and Future Research