Improved Training Strategies for Physics-Informed Neural Networks using Real Experimental Data in Aluminum Spot Welding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Resistance spot welding is the dominant joining process for the body-in-white in the automotive industry, where the weld nugget diameter is the key quality metric. Its measurement requires destructive testing, limiting the potential for efficient quality control. Physics-informed neural networks were investigated as a promising tool to reconstruct internal process states from experimental data, enabling model-based and non-invasive quality assessment in aluminum spot welding. A major challenge is the integration of real-world data into the network due to competing optimization objectives. To address this, we introduce two novel training strategies. First, experimental losses for dynamic displacement and nugget diameter are progressively included using a fading-in function to prevent excessive optimization conflicts. We also implement a custom learning rate scheduler and early stopping based on a rolling window to counteract premature reduction due to increased loss magnitudes. Second, we introduce a conditional update of temperature-dependent material parameters via a look-up table, activated only after a loss threshold is reached to ensure physically meaningful temperatures. An axially symmetric two-dimensional model was selected to represent the welding process accurately while maintaining computational efficiency. To reduce computational burden, the training strategies and model components were first systematically evaluated in one dimension, enabling controlled analysis of loss design and contact models. The two-dimensional network predicts dynamic displacement and nugget growth within the experimental confidence interval, supports transferring welding stages from steel to aluminum, and demonstrates strong potential for fast, model-based quality control in industrial applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.
Builds on
12 of 96 references.
References · 12
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 470
- 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 362
- 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part II): Data-driven Discovery of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 158
- 2016Why and When Can Deep -- but Not Shallow -- Networks Avoid the Curse of Dimensionality: a Reviewcited by 155
- 2023An Expert's Guide to Training Physics-informed Neural Networkscited by 119
- 2023Can Physics-Informed Neural Networks beat the Finite Element Method?cited by 68
- 2018A proof that artificial neural networks overcome the curse of dimensionality in the numerical approximation of Black-Scholes partial differential equationscited by 55
- 2023Physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse problems in complex beam systemscited by 24
- 2022Physics-informed neural networks for solving parametric magnetostatic problemscited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.