A Comprehensive Framework for Uncertainty Quantification of Voxel-wise Supervised Models in IVIM MRI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate estimation of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters from diffusion-weighted MRI remains challenging due to the ill-posed nature of the inverse problem and high sensitivity to noise, particularly in the perfusion compartment. In this work, we propose a probabilistic deep learning framework based on Deep Ensembles (DE) of Mixture Density Networks (MDNs), enabling estimation of total predictive uncertainty and decomposition into aleatoric (AU) and epistemic (EU) components. The method was benchmarked against non probabilistic neural networks, a Bayesian fitting approach and a probabilistic network with single Gaussian parametrization. Supervised training was performed on synthetic data, and evaluation was conducted on both simulated and an in vivo dataset. The reliability of the quantified uncertainties was assessed using calibration curves, output distribution sharpness, and the Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS). MDNs produced more calibrated and sharper predictive distributions for the diffusion coefficient D and fraction f parameters, although slight overconfidence was observed in pseudo-diffusion coefficient D*. The Robust Coefficient of Variation (RCV) indicated smoother in vivo estimates for D* with MDNs compared to Gaussian model. Despite the training data covering the expected physiological range, elevated EU in vivo suggests a mismatch with real acquisition conditions, highlighting the importance of incorporating EU, which was allowed by DE. Overall, we present a comprehensive framework for IVIM fitting with uncertainty quantification, which enables the identification and interpretation of unreliable estimates. The proposed approach can also be adopted for fitting other physical models through appropriate architectural and simulation adjustments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.
Builds on
14 of 55 references.
References · 14
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
- 2019Evaluating Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning Methods for Robust Computer Visioncited by 182
- 2022Trustworthy clinical AI solutions: a unified review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning models for medical image analysiscited by 63
- 2019Quality of Uncertainty Quantification for Bayesian Neural Network Inferencecited by 59
- 2023A review of uncertainty quantification in medical image analysis: probabilistic and non-probabilistic methodscited by 39
- 2020Improved unsupervised physics-informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patientscited by 16
- 2021How to Evaluate Uncertainty Estimates in Machine Learning for Regression?cited by 15
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.