mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ViFP: A Framework for Visual False Positive Detection to Enhance Reasoning Reliability in VLMs

arXiv 2508.04201 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

During reasoning in vision-language models (VLMs), false positive (FP) reasoning occurs when a model produces the correct answer but follows an incorrect reasoning path, resulting in undermined reasoning reliability. Existing approaches mainly rely on prompt engineering, knowledge distillation or reinforcement learning to improve reasoning reliability, both of which require large amounts of high-quality data and thus limit practical applicability. Few approaches have focused on directly detecting and correcting FPs. To address these issues, we propose ViFP, a framework for Visual False Positive Detection to Enhance Reasoning Reliability in VLMs. ViFP builds effective reasoning paths through multi-turn QA and dynamically analyzes the consistency of the reasoning path to identify potential FPs. It also introduces a targeted reasoning chain correction mechanism to modify FP reasoning, thereby improving logical consistency and accuracy. Finally, we introduce a reliability evaluation metric, VoC, which integrates answer accuracy and the FP rate, providing a quantitative tool to assess whether a VLM not only answers correctly but also reasons reliably. Our experiments on closed-source VLMs show that ViFP consistently improves performance across three datasets: A-OKVQA, OK-VQA, and FVQA. On A-OKVQA, ViFP improves accuracy by up to 5.4%, surpassing the previous state-of-the-art by 4.3%, and significantly reduces the number of FPs, validating its benefits in enhancing reasoning reliability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.

Builds on

12 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Reason-RFT: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Visual Reasoning of Vision Language Models26 Mar
  2. 2024LLaVA-CoT: Let Vision Language Models Reason Step-by-Step15 Nov

Other references · 10

  1. 2024MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phonecited by 1,079
  2. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
  3. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 279
  4. 2022PromptCap: Prompt-Guided Task-Aware Image Captioningcited by 104
  5. 2021Zero-shot Visual Question Answering using Knowledge Graphcited by 37
  6. 2024Mini-Monkey: Alleviating the Semantic Sawtooth Effect for Lightweight MLLMs via Complementary Image Pyramidcited by 26
  7. 2025Examining False Positives under Inference Scaling for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 11
  8. 2024GeReA: Question-Aware Prompt Captions for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answeringcited by 9
  9. 2024Multimodal Reranking for Knowledge-Intensive Visual Question Answeringcited by 6
  10. 2025Seeing is Not Reasoning: MVPBench for Graph-based Evaluation of Multi-path Visual Physical CoTcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026VRIQ: Benchmarking and Analyzing Visual-Reasoning IQ of VLMs
  2. 2026Learning Adaptive Reasoning Paths for Efficient Visual Reasoning
  3. 2025VReST: Enhancing Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models through Tree Search and Self-Reward Mechanism
  4. 2026See Further, Think Deeper: Advancing VLM's Reasoning Ability with Low-level Visual Cues and Reflection
  5. 2025Visual CoT Makes VLMs Smarter but More Fragile
  6. 2025Unbiased Visual Reasoning with Controlled Visual Inputs
  7. 2026Answer-Level Trust Selection for Physical Vision-Language Reasoning
  8. 2026Can VLMs Reason Robustly? A Neuro-Symbolic Investigation