mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transferring Expert Cognitive Models to Social Robots via Agentic Concept Bottleneck Models

arXiv 2508.03998 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

Successful group meetings, such as those implemented in group behavioral-change programs, work meetings, and other social contexts, must promote individual goal setting and execution while strengthening the social relationships within the group. Consequently, an ideal facilitator must be sensitive to the subtle dynamics of disengagement, difficulties with individual goal setting and execution, and interpersonal difficulties that signal a need for intervention. The challenges and cognitive load experienced by facilitators create a critical gap for an embodied technology that can interpret social exchanges while remaining aware of the needs of the individuals in the group and providing transparent recommendations that go beyond powerful but "black box" foundation models (FMs) that identify social cues. We address this important demand with a social robot co-facilitator that analyzes multimodal meeting data and provides discreet cues to the facilitator. The robot's reasoning is powered by an agentic concept bottleneck model (CBM), which makes decisions based on human-interpretable concepts like participant engagement and sentiments, ensuring transparency and trustworthiness. Our core contribution is a transfer learning framework that distills the broad social understanding of an FM into our specialized and transparent CBM. This concept-driven system significantly outperforms direct zero-shot FMs in predicting the need for intervention and enables real-time human correction of its reasoning. Critically, we demonstrate robust knowledge transfer: the model generalizes across different groups and successfully transfers the expertise of senior human facilitators to improve the performance of novices. By transferring an expert's cognitive model into an interpretable robotic partner, our work provides a powerful blueprint for augmenting human capabilities in complex social domains.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 2 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.

Builds on

2 of 23 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  2. 2024Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populationscited by 123

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Social Human Robot Embodied Conversation (SHREC) Dataset: Benchmarking Foundational Models' Social Reasoning
  2. 2026Humans' ALMANAC: A Human Collaboration Dataset of Action-Level Mental Model Annotations for Agent Collaboration
  3. 2026Evaluating Generative Models as Interactive Emergent Representations of Human-Like Collaborative Behavior
  4. 2026GroupToM-Bench: Benchmarking Group Theory of Mind and Nonlinear Social Emergence in MLLMs
  5. 2022CASPER: Cognitive Architecture for Social Perception and Engagement in Robots
  6. 2025ProToM: Promoting Prosocial Behaviour via Theory of Mind-Informed Feedback
  7. 2025Sentient Agent as a Judge: Evaluating Higher-Order Social Cognition in Large Language Models
  8. 2024Social Learning through Interactions with Other Agents: A Survey