Tell Me Without Telling Me: Two-Way Prediction of Visualization Literacy and Visual Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accounting for individual differences can improve the effectiveness of visualization design. While the role of visual attention in visualization interpretation is well recognized, existing work often overlooks how this behavior varies based on visual literacy levels. Based on data from a 235-participant user study covering three visualization tests (mini-VLAT, CALVI, and SGL), we show that distinct attention patterns in visual data exploration can correlate with participants' literacy levels: While experts (high-scorers) generally show a strong attentional focus, novices (low-scorers) focus less and explore more. We then propose two computational models leveraging these insights: Lit2Sal -- a novel visual saliency model that predicts observer attention given their visualization literacy level, and Sal2Lit -- a model to predict visual literacy from human visual attention data. Our quantitative and qualitative evaluation demonstrates that Lit2Sal outperforms state-of-the-art saliency models with literacy-aware considerations. Sal2Lit predicts literacy with 86% accuracy using a single attention map, providing a time-efficient supplement to literacy assessment that only takes less than a minute. Taken together, our unique approach to consider individual differences in salience models and visual attention in literacy assessments paves the way for new directions in personalized visual data communication to enhance understanding.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2025.
Builds on
23 of 91 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
- 2016What do different evaluation metrics tell us about saliency models?cited by 184
- 2015Salient Object Detection: A Benchmarkcited by 130
- 2021Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needscited by 64
- 2018Did the Model Understand the Question?cited by 60
- 2021TranSalNet: Towards perceptually relevant visual saliency predictioncited by 44
- 2020Predicting Visual Importance Across Graphic Design Typescited by 30
- 2021Shared Interest: Measuring Human-AI Alignment to Identify Recurring Patterns in Model Behaviorcited by 29
- 2017Learning Visual Importance for Graphic Designs and Data Visualizationscited by 22
- 2025Benchmarking Visual Language Models on Standardized Visualization Literacy Testscited by 20
11 more
- 2023Mini-VLAT: A Short and Effective Measure of Visualization Literacycited by 16
- 2023Adaptive Assessment of Visualization Literacycited by 6
- 2020Survey on Individual Differences in Visualizationcited by 5
- 2020How to evaluate data visualizations across different levels of understandingcited by 5
- 2021Scanpath Prediction on Information Visualisationscited by 5
- 2024Do You See What I See? A Qualitative Study Eliciting High-Level Visualization Comprehensioncited by 5
- 2019Data is Personal: Attitudes and Perceptions of Data Visualization in Rural Pennsylvaniacited by 4
- 2022Affective Learning Objectives for Communicative Visualizationscited by 4
- 2020TurkEyes: A Web-Based Toolbox for Crowdsourcing Attention Datacited by 3
- 2020Communicative Visualizations as a Learning Problemcited by 3
- 2024Same Data, Diverging Perspectives: The Power of Visualizations to Elicit Competing Interpretationscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.