mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Classifying Epistemic Relationships in Human-AI Interaction: An Exploratory Approach

arXiv 2508.03673 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2025cs.HC cs.AI cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI systems become integral to knowledge-intensive work, questions arise not only about their functionality but also their epistemic roles in human-AI interaction. While HCI research has proposed various AI role typologies, it often overlooks how AI reshapes users' roles as knowledge contributors. This study examines how users form epistemic relationships with AI-how they assess, trust, and collaborate with it in research and teaching contexts. Based on 31 interviews with academics across disciplines, we developed a five-part codebook and identified five relationship types: Instrumental Reliance, Contingent Delegation, Co-agency Collaboration, Authority Displacement, and Epistemic Abstention. These reflect variations in trust, assessment modes, tasks, and human epistemic status. Our findings show that epistemic roles are dynamic and context-dependent. We argue for shifting beyond static metaphors of AI toward a more nuanced framework that captures how humans and AI co-construct knowledge, enriching HCI's understanding of the relational and normative dimensions of AI use.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2025.

Builds on

2 of 26 references.

References · 2

  1. 2024Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Frameworkcited by 27
  2. 2023A Systematic Review on Fostering Appropriate Trust in Human-AI Interactioncited by 21

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.