LECTOR: LLM-Enhanced Concept-based Test-Oriented Repetition for Adaptive Spaced Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spaced repetition systems are fundamental to efficient learning and memory retention, but existing algorithms often struggle with semantic interference and personalized adaptation. We present LECTOR (LLM-Enhanced Concept-based Test-Oriented Repetition), a novel adaptive scheduling algorithm specifically designed for test-oriented learning scenarios, particularly language examinations where success rate is paramount. LECTOR leverages large language models for semantic analysis while incorporating personalized learning profiles, addressing the critical challenge of semantic confusion in vocabulary learning by utilizing LLM-powered semantic similarity assessment and integrating it with established spaced repetition principles. Our comprehensive evaluation against six baseline algorithms (SSP-MMC, SM2, HLR, FSRS, ANKI, THRESHOLD) across 100 simulated learners over 100 days demonstrates significant improvements: LECTOR achieves a 90.2% success rate compared to 88.4% for the best baseline (SSP-MMC), representing a 2.0% relative improvement. The algorithm shows particular strength in handling semantically similar concepts, reducing confusion-induced errors while maintaining computational efficiency. Our results establish LECTOR as a promising direction for intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive learning platforms.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.
Builds on
7 of 18 references.
References · 7
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
- 2015Deep Knowledge Tracingcited by 332
Built on by
Not cited yet.