mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Morse-Bott Framework for Blind Inverse Problems: Local Recovery Guarantees and the Failure of the MAP

arXiv 2508.02923 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimation is a cornerstone framework for blind inverse problems, where an image and a forward operator are jointly estimated as the maximizers of a posterior distribution. In applications such as blind deblurring, this principle is used to recover sharp images from degraded observations. In this paper, we analyze the recovery guarantees of MAP-based methods by adopting a Morse--Bott framework. We model the image potential as a Morse--Bott function, where natural images are modeled as residing locally on a critical submanifold. This means that while the potential is locally flat along the ``natural'' directions of the image manifold, it is strictly convex in the directions normal to it. We demonstrate that this Morse--Bott hypothesis aligns with the structural properties of state-of-the-art learned priors, a finding we validate through an experimental analysis of the potential landscape and its Hessian spectrum. Our theoretical results show that, in a neighborhood of the ground-truth image and operator, the posterior admits local minimizers that are stable both with respect to initialization (gradient descents converge to the same minimizer) and to small perturbations of the data (solutions vary smoothly with the observations). This local stability potentially provides a theoretical justification for the empirical success of well designed gradient-based optimization in these settings. However, we also demonstrate that this local stability is a local property: the ``blurry trap'', well-known for sparse priors in blind deconvolution, persists even with state-of-the-art learned priors. Our findings demonstrate that the failure of MAP in blind deconvolution is not a limitation of prior quality, but an intrinsic characteristic of the landscape. We conclude that successful recovery depends on strategic initialization around favorable local minima.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2025.

Builds on

18 of 46 references.

References · 18

  1. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  3. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  4. 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 3,045
  5. 2020Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Deep Denoiser Priorcited by 470
  6. 2017Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 339
  7. 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 315
  8. 2022Score-Based Generative Models Detect Manifoldscited by 122
  9. 2022Parallel Diffusion Models of Operator and Image for Blind Inverse Problemscited by 113
  10. 2021Gradient Step Denoiser for convergent Plug-and-Playcited by 108
  11. 2018Regularization by Denoising: Clarifications and New Interpretationscited by 103
  12. 2025DeepInverse: A Python package for solving imaging inverse problems with deep learningcited by 28
6 more
  1. 2024Diffusion Models as Cartoonists: The Curious Case of High Density Regionscited by 21
  2. 2014Local Linear Convergence of Forward-Backward under Partial Smoothnesscited by 13
  3. 2020Spatially-Variant CNN-based Point Spread Function Estimation for Blind Deconvolution and Depth Estimation in Optical Microscopycited by 7
  4. 2014Model Consistency of Partly Smooth Regularizerscited by 6
  5. 2019On the convex geometry of blind deconvolution and matrix completioncited by 4
  6. 2021Blind inverse problems with isolated spikescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.