mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Real-World Receptivity to Adaptive Mental Health Interventions: Findings from an In-the-Wild Study

arXiv 2508.02817 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2025cs.HC cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of mobile health (mHealth) technologies has enabled real-time monitoring and intervention for mental health conditions using passively sensed smartphone data. Building on these capabilities, Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) seek to deliver personalized support at opportune moments, adapting to users' evolving contexts and needs. Although prior research has examined how context affects user responses to generic notifications and general mHealth messages, relatively little work has explored its influence on engagement with actual mental health interventions. Furthermore, while much of the existing research has focused on detecting when users might benefit from an intervention, less attention has been paid to understanding receptivity, i.e., users' willingness and ability to engage with and act upon the intervention. In this study, we investigate user receptivity through two components: acceptance(acknowledging or engaging with a prompt) and feasibility (ability to act given situational constraints). We conducted a two-week in-the-wild study with 70 students using a custom Android app, LogMe, which collected passive sensor data and active context reports to prompt mental health interventions. The adaptive intervention module was built using Thompson Sampling, a reinforcement learning algorithm. We address four research questions relating smartphone features and self-reported contexts to acceptance and feasibility, and examine whether an adaptive reinforcement learning approach can optimize intervention delivery by maximizing a combined receptivity reward. Our results show that several types of passively sensed data significantly influenced user receptivity to interventions. Our findings contribute insights into the design of context-aware, adaptive interventions that are not only timely but also actionable in real-world settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2025.

Builds on

6 of 45 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Personalized HeartSteps: A Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Optimizing Physical Activitycited by 70
  2. 2023MindShift: Leveraging Large Language Models for Mental-States-Based Problematic Smartphone Use Interventioncited by 16
  3. 2020Detecting Receptivity for mHealth Interventions in the Natural Environmentcited by 8
  4. 2023Using Adaptive Bandit Experiments to Increase and Investigate Engagement in Mental Healthcited by 6
  5. 2024Context in Public Health for Underserved Communities: A Bayesian Approach to Online Restless Banditscited by 6
  6. 2020Quantifying Low-Battery Anxiety of Mobile Users and Its Impacts on Video Watching Behaviorcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Comparative Study of Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Large Language Models for Mental Health Forecasting using Smartphone Sensing Data
  2. 2025An Offline Mobile Conversational Agent for Mental Health Support: Learning from Emotional Dialogues and Psychological Texts with Student-Centered Evaluation
  3. 2025RedditESS: A Mental Health Social Support Interaction Dataset -- Understanding Effective Social Support to Refine AI-Driven Support Tools
  4. 2026Seeking Help, Facing Harm: Auditing TikTok's Mental Health Recommendations ↗
  5. 2024Defining Effective Engagement For Enhancing Cancer Patients' Well-being with Mobile Digital Behavior Change Interventions
  6. 2025LLM Agent-Based Simulation of Student Activities and Mental Health Using Smartphone Sensing Data
  7. 2025Practical considerations when designing an online learning algorithm for an app-based mHealth intervention
  8. 2025A Personalized Exercise Assistant using Reinforcement Learning (PEARL): Results from a four-arm Randomized-controlled Trial