mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

L3M+P: Lifelong Planning with Large Language Models

arXiv 2508.01917 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

By combining classical planning methods with large language models (LLMs), recent research such as LLM+P has enabled agents to plan for general tasks given in natural language. However, scaling these methods to general-purpose service robots remains challenging: (1) classical planning algorithms generally require a detailed and consistent specification of the environment, which is not always readily available; and (2) existing frameworks mainly focus on isolated planning tasks, whereas robots are often meant to serve in long-term continuous deployments, and therefore must maintain a dynamic memory of the environment which can be updated with multi-modal inputs and extracted as planning knowledge for future tasks. To address these two issues, this paper introduces L3M+P (Lifelong LLM+P), a framework that uses an external knowledge graph as a representation of the world state. The graph can be updated from multiple sources of information, including sensory input and natural language interactions with humans. L3M+P enforces rules for the expected format of the absolute world state graph to maintain consistency between graph updates. At planning time, given a natural language description of a task, L3M+P retrieves context from the knowledge graph and generates a problem definition for classical planners. Evaluated on household robot simulators and on a real-world service robot, L3M+P achieves significant improvement over baseline methods both on accurately registering natural language state changes and on correctly generating plans, thanks to the knowledge graph retrieval and verification.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2025.

Builds on

18 of 32 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  3. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  4. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  5. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  6. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
  7. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,205
  8. 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agentscited by 1,063
  9. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,035
  10. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 869
  11. 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 501
  12. 2022LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 462
6 more
  1. 2022ProcTHOR: Large-Scale Embodied AI Using Procedural Generationcited by 380
  2. 2024Open3DSG: Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Graphs from Point Clouds with Queryable Objects and Open-Set Relationshipscited by 80
  3. 2023Dynamic Planning with a LLMcited by 61
  4. 2023Statler: State-Maintaining Language Models for Embodied Reasoningcited by 40
  5. 2023Context-Aware Entity Grounding with Open-Vocabulary 3D Scene Graphscited by 33
  6. 2024Grounding LLMs For Robot Task Planning Using Closed-loop State Feedbackcited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.