HeQ: a Large and Diverse Hebrew Reading Comprehension Benchmark
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current benchmarks for Hebrew Natural Language Processing (NLP) focus mainly on morpho-syntactic tasks, neglecting the semantic dimension of language understanding. To bridge this gap, we set out to deliver a Hebrew Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) dataset, where MRC is to be realized as extractive Question Answering. The morphologically rich nature of Hebrew poses a challenge to this endeavor: the indeterminacy and non-transparency of span boundaries in morphologically complex forms lead to annotation inconsistencies, disagreements, and flaws in standard evaluation metrics. To remedy this, we devise a novel set of guidelines, a controlled crowdsourcing protocol, and revised evaluation metrics that are suitable for the morphologically rich nature of the language. Our resulting benchmark, HeQ (Hebrew QA), features 30,147 diverse question-answer pairs derived from both Hebrew Wikipedia articles and Israeli tech news. Our empirical investigation reveals that standard evaluation metrics such as F1 scores and Exact Match (EM) are not appropriate for Hebrew (and other MRLs), and we propose a relevant enhancement. In addition, our experiments show low correlation between models' performance on morpho-syntactic tasks and on MRC, which suggests that models designed for the former might underperform on semantics-heavy tasks. The development and exploration of HeQ illustrate some of the challenges MRLs pose in natural language understanding (NLU), fostering progression towards more and better NLU models for Hebrew and other MRLs.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2025.
Builds on
18 of 28 references.
References · 18
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 834
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
- 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 488
- 2016NewsQA: A Machine Comprehension Datasetcited by 331
6 more
- 2018Neural Approaches to Conversational AIcited by 165
- 2020Look at the First Sentence: Position Bias in Question Answeringcited by 84
- 2022Measuring Causal Effects of Data Statistics on Language Model's `Factual' Predictionscited by 57
- 2022Large Pre-Trained Models with Extra-Large Vocabularies: A Contrastive Analysis of Hebrew BERT Models and a New One to Outperform Them Allcited by 14
- 2021ParaShoot: A Hebrew Question Answering Datasetcited by 12
- 2022Look to the Right: Mitigating Relative Position Bias in Extractive Question Answeringcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.