Predictive Auditing of Hidden Tokens in LLM APIs via Reasoning Length Estimation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Commercial LLM services often conceal internal reasoning traces while still charging users for every generated token, including those from hidden intermediate steps, raising concerns of token inflation and potential overbilling. This gap underscores the urgent need for reliable token auditing, yet achieving it is far from straightforward: cryptographic verification (e.g., hash-based signature) offers little assurance when providers control the entire execution pipeline, while user-side prediction struggles with the inherent variance of reasoning LLMs, where token usage fluctuates across domains and prompt styles. To bridge this gap, we present PALACE (Predictive Auditing of LLM APIs via Reasoning Token Count Estimation), a user-side framework that estimates hidden reasoning token counts from prompt-answer pairs without access to internal traces. PALACE introduces a GRPO-augmented adaptation module with a lightweight domain router, enabling dynamic calibration across diverse reasoning tasks and mitigating variance in token usage patterns. Experiments on math, coding, medical, and general reasoning benchmarks show that PALACE achieves low relative error and strong prediction accuracy, supporting both fine-grained cost auditing and inflation detection. Taken together, PALACE represents an important first step toward standardized predictive auditing, offering a practical path to greater transparency, accountability, and user trust.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2025.
Builds on
14 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025CoIn: Counting the Invisible Reasoning Tokens in Commercial Opaque LLM APIs19 May
- 2025L1: Controlling How Long A Reasoning Model Thinks With Reinforcement Learning6 Mar
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
Other references · 11
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,244
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 742
- 2024HuatuoGPT-o1, Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMscited by 265
- 2024The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Modelscited by 153
- 2024LLM Reasoners: New Evaluation, Library, and Analysis of Step-by-Step Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 70
- 2025Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIscited by 38
- 2025Invisible Tokens, Visible Bills: The Urgent Need to Audit Hidden Operations in Opaque LLM Servicescited by 10
- 2025Trust, but verifycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2025Auditing Pay-Per-Token in Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026Your "Pro" LLM Subscription May Actually Be "Free": Exposing Fingerprint Spoofing Risks in LLM Inference Servicescited by 3
- 2026Computational Arbitrage in AI Model Marketscited by 1
- 2026Behavioral Consistency and Transparency Analysis on Large Language Model API Gatewayscited by 1
- 2026Token Inflation: How Dishonest Providers Can Overcharge for Large Language Model Usagecited by 1
- 2026SCoOP: Semantic Consistent Opinion Pooling for Uncertainty Quantification in Multiple Vision-Language Model Systemscited by 0
- 2026Strategic Self-Consistencycited by 0
- 2026Strategic Self-Consistency24 Sep 2026
- 2026Your "Pro" LLM Subscription May Actually Be "Free": Exposing Fingerprint Spoofing Risks in LLM Inference Services15 Jun 2026
- 2026Token Inflation: How Dishonest Providers Can Overcharge for Large Language Model Usage28 May 2026
- 2026Behavioral Consistency and Transparency Analysis on Large Language Model API Gateways22 Apr 2026
- 2026SCoOP: Semantic Consistent Opinion Pooling for Uncertainty Quantification in Multiple Vision-Language Model Systems25 Mar 2026
- 2026Computational Arbitrage in AI Model Markets23 Mar 2026
- 2025Auditing Pay-Per-Token in Large Language Models5 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026IMMACULATE: A Practical LLM Auditing Framework via Verifiable Computation
- 2026Luna-2: Scalable Single-Token Evaluation with Small Language Models
- 2025OckBench: Measuring the Efficiency of LLM Reasoning
- 2026Safer Reasoning Traces: Measuring and Mitigating Chain-of-Thought Leakage in LLMs
- 2026LatentGuard: Efficient and Inspectable Latent Reasoning for LLM Safeguards
- 2026Beyond Accuracy: Decomposing the Reasoning Efficiency of LLMs
- 2025Token-Efficient Prompt Injection Attack: Provoking Cessation in LLM Reasoning via Adaptive Token Compression
- 2026AEX: Non-Intrusive Multi-Hop Attestation and Provenance for LLM APIs