mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From LLMs to Edge: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning on Edge Devices

arXiv 2507.23536 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods reduce the computational costs of updating deep learning models by minimizing the number of additional parameters used to adapt a model to a down- stream task. While extensively researched in large language models (LLMs), their application to smaller models used on edge devices, such as convolutional neural networks, remains underexplored. This paper benchmarks and analyzes popular PEFT methods on convolutional architectures typically deployed in resource-constrained edge environments. We evaluate LoRA, DoRA, and GaLore for updating standard and depthwise convolutional architectures to handle distribution shifts and accommodate unseen classes. We utilize recently proposed PyTorch profilers to compare the updated model performance and computational costs of these PEFT methods with traditional fine-tuning approaches. With resource efficiency in mind, we investigate their update behavior across different rank dimensions. We find that the evaluated PEFT methods are only half as memory-efficient when applied to depthwise-separable convolution architectures, compared to their efficiency with LLMs. Conversely, when targeting convolu- tional architectures optimized for edge deployment, adapter-based PEFT methods can reduce floating point operations (FLOPs) during model updates by up to 95%. These insights offer valuable guidance for selecting PEFT methods based on hardware constraints, performance requirements, and application needs. Our code is online.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2025.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  6. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  7. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
  8. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  9. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 656
  10. 2024GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projectioncited by 463
  11. 2019Edge Intelligence: Paving the Last Mile of Artificial Intelligence with Edge Computingcited by 228
  12. 2020Training BatchNorm and Only BatchNorm: On the Expressive Power of Random Features in CNNscited by 104
7 more
  1. 2023SLoRA: Federated Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Modelscited by 93
  2. 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
  3. 2020μNAS: Constrained Neural Architecture Search for Microcontrollerscited by 55
  4. 2024Tiny Machine Learning: Progress and Futurescited by 40
  5. 2022Mandheling: Mixed-Precision On-Device DNN Training with DSP Offloadingcited by 29
  6. 2024The Entropy Enigma: Success and Failure of Entropy Minimizationcited by 24
  7. 2023REDS: Resource-Efficient Deep Subnetworks for Dynamic Resource Constraintscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.